INTRODUCTION
CURRENT STATUS OF OCULAR ANGIOSTRONGYLIASIS
Table 1.
Age | Sex | Affected side | VA Rt | VA Lt | duration | Worm in | Size of worm | Ocular disease | Meningitis | eosinophilia | treatment | outcome | Year | Reference | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Thai | 34 | M | R | LP | 20/20 | 6 weeks | AC | 13 mm | N | N | surgival removal | count finger: slightly improved | 1962 | 4 | |
2 | Thai | 22 | M | L | 6/6 | LP | 2 months | AC | 18.86 mm | N | N | surgival removal | not improved | 1966 | 5 | |
3 | Thai | 21 | M | L | 6/6 | 2/60 | 1 day | AC | 8.55 mm | chronic retinitis and vitreous opacity | N | N | paracentesis | improved, 6/24 | 1965 | 6 |
4 | Thai | 34 | M | L | 6/6 | CF | 10 days | VF | 11.7 mm | panophthalmitis | Y | Y | surgival removal | not improved | 1971 | 7 |
5 | Thai | 36 | M | L | 20/20 | CF 2 feet | 9 days | retina | 12.5 mm | retinal and macular edema | Y | NA | surgival removal | not improved | 1974 | 8 |
6 | Thai | 72 | F | R | CF | 1 month | VF | 9.22 mm | N | N | surgival removal | not improved | 1986 | 9 | ||
7 | Thai | 28 | M | R | CF 1 foot 20/20 | 14 days | VF | < 10 mm | N | N | aspirator and vitrectomy | improved, 20/200 | 2003 | 10 | ||
8 | Thai | 44 | M | L | NA | NA | NA | VF | 12 mm + 1dead worm | N | N | aspirator and vitrectomy | improved, 6/200 | 10 | ||
9 | Thai | 21 | M | L | 6/9 | 2/60 | 14 days | VF | NA | optic neuritis | Y | Y | laser, oral steroid | not improved | 2007 | 11 |
10 | Thai | 36 | F | L | 6/6 | CF | NA | VF | 9.8 mm | papilledema | Y | NA | surgival removal | slightly improved | 11 | |
11 | Thai | 22 | F | R | 1/60 | 6/6 | 2 months | VF | 10.9 mm | N | N | surgival removal | NA | 11 | ||
12 | Thai | 39 | M | R | 6/6 | 6/6 | 10 days | VF | NA | N | NA | laser | normal VA | 11 | ||
13 | Thai | 33 | F | L | 6/6 | 1/60 | 7 days | subretinal | NA | N | N | laer, steroid | slightly improved, 5/60 | 11 | ||
14 | Thai | 28 | M | R | 6/24 | 6/6 | 4 days | subretinal | NA | N | NA | laser, oral steroid | not improved | 11 | ||
15 | Thai | 48 | M | R | CF | 6/6 | 21 days | VF | 11.4 mm | N | N | laser, surgical removal | not improved | 11 | ||
16 | Thai | 47 | M | L | 6/6 | CF 2 feet | 21 days | AC | ND | optic neuritis | N | NA | laser, aspirator IV methylprednisolone | improved, 2/60 | 2008 | 12 |
17 | Thai | 27 | M | L | 6/6 | 1/60 | 21 days | VF | ND | optic neuritis?? | Y | NA | laser, surgical removal | slightly improved, 6/60 | 12 | |
18 | Thai | 36 | M | R | 2/60 | 6/6 | 7 days | subretinal | ND | optic neuritis?? | N | NA | laser | slightly improved, 6/60 | 12 | |
19 | Thai | 27 | M | R | CF 1 feet | 1 month | subretinal | 15 mm | optic neuritis | N | N | albendazole, steroid laser | slightly improved 2/60 | 2013 | 13 | |
20 | Sri Lanka | 30 | M | R | No LP | NA | 1 month | AC | 11.6 mm | N | NA | forceps extraction | NA | 1993 | 14 | |
21 | Sri Lanka | 30 | M | R | 6/60 | 6/6 | 2 days | subretina to VF | 6.3 mm | retinal edema | Y | Y | forceps extraction | not improved | 1998 | 15 |
22 | Sri Lanka | 20 | M | L | 6/6 | 6/9 | 3 days | AC | 6.5 mm | N | N | needle aspiration | improved | 2001 | 16 | |
23 | Sri Lanka | M | R | LP | 6/6 | days | AC | 11.4 mm | N | NA | surgival removal | improved, 6/60 | 2004 | 17 | ||
24 | Sri Lanka | 25 | F | R | 6/60 | 6/6 | 14 days | retina | 8.5 mm | N | NA | surgival removal | NA | 2007 | 18 | |
25 | India | 12 | M | L | 6/6 | 6/60 | 14 days | AC | 28 mm | optic neuritis?? | N | Y | surgival removal | improved, 6/6 | 2006 | 19 |
26 | India | 40 | F | L | NA | NA | NA | VF | 13 mm | Y | Y | surgival removal | NA | 2008 | 20 | |
27 | Mainland China | 34 | M | L | retina | 12 mm | N | 1999 | 21 | |||||||
28 | Mainland China | 35 | M | L | AC | 12.3 mm | optic neuritis | N | 2000 | 22 | ||||||
29 | Mainland China | AC | 2001 | 23 | ||||||||||||
30 | Mainland China | 47 | M | R | blurred | NA | NA | optic nerve | optic nerve compression | Y | NA | surgival removal | not improved | 2009 | 24 | |
31 | Taiwan | 52 | F | R/L | CF | LP | 7 days | (-) | bilateral necrotizing retinitis | Y | NA | IV methylprednisolone | not improved | 2006 | 25 | |
32 | Taiwan | 38 | M | L | 20/20 | 20/50 | 2 days | not identified | (-) | optic neuritis | Y | Y | mebendazole, IV methylprednisolone | slightly improved, 20/25 | 2006 | 26 |
33 | Japan | 62 | F | L | 20/25 | 2/200 | 1 day | VF | 12 mm | optic neuritis?? | N | Y | surgival removal | not improved | 2002 | 27 |
34 | Japan | 24 | M | L | 6/6 | 6/9 to 6/100 | 1 day | VF | 5 mm | Y | Y | oral steroid, LP | improved, normal VA6/6 | 1988 | 28 | |
35 | Vietnam | 12 mm | N | 1974 | 29 | |||||||||||
36 | Vietnam | 3 | F | R | 3 days | AC | 15 mm | Y | surgival removal | VA0.6 | 2002 | 30 | ||||
37 | Indonesia | 23 | F | L | 5/5 | 3/60 | 14 days | AC | 11.1 mm | N | N | paracentesis | not improved | 1977 | 31 | |
38 | Papua New Guinea | 45 | F | R | 6/36 | 6/6 | 3 months | VF | <1 cm | acute ciliary injection with blepharospasm | N | Y | topical steroid, topical antibiotics | not improved | 1982 | 32 |
39 | Malaysia | 57 | M | L | 6/6 | 6/36 | 3 days | retina | ND | N | Y | surgival removal | improved, 6/24 | 2003 | 33 | |
40 | Soouth Africa (UK) | 33 | M | R | 6/9 | 6/5 | 2 days | AC | 22 mm | anterior uveitis | N | NA | needle aspiration | improved, normal VA6/6 | 2005 | 34 |
41 | Nepal | M | R | 20/80 | 20/20 | VF | 15 mm | uveitis | N | 2008 | 35 | |||||
42 | Jamica | 30 | F | L | 6/5 | CF | 1 month | AC | 19.9 mm | N | N | surgival removal | improved, 6/36 | 2009 | 36 |
CLINICAL FEATURES OF OCULAR ANGIOSTRONGYLIASIS
OPTIC NEURITIS AND OTHER OCULAR ABNORMALITIES
Table 2.
Country or area | Age | Sex | Affected side of eye | Meningitis | RAPD | VEP | Outcome (improvement) | Ref. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mainland China | 35 | M | left | no | + | prolonged | NA | [22] |
Taiwan | 38 | M | left | yes | + | prolonged | slightly | [25] |
Thailand | 47 | M | left | no | + | prolonged | improved | [12] |
Thailand | 27 | M | left | yes | NA | NA | slightly | [12] |
Thailand | 36 | M | right | no | - | normal | slightly | [12] |
Thailand | 27 | M | right | no | + | prolonged | slightly | [13] |
DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT, AND PROGNOSIS OF OPTIC NEURITIS CAUSED BY A. CANTONENSIS
PERSPECTIVES OF OPTIC NEURITIS CAUSED BY A. CANTONENSIS
How do larvae migrate into the eyes? Via blood flow or by other routes?
What is the relationship between optic neuritis and eosinophilic meningitis?
What is the relationship among clinical symptoms, pathological changes, and the prognosis? What causes those pathological changes?
How can we treat cases of optic neuritis due to A. cantonensis infection?