Cryptosporidium can cause gastrointestinal diseases worldwide, consequently posing public health problems and economic burden. Effective techniques for detecting contaminated oocysts in water are important to prevent and control the contamination. Immunomagnetic separation (IMS) method has been widely employed recently due to its efficiency, but, it is costly. Sucrose floatation technique is generally used for separating organisms by using their different specific gravity. It is effective and cheap but time consuming as well as requiring highly skilled personnel. Water turbidity and parasite load in water sample are additional factors affecting to the recovery rate of those 2 methods. We compared the efficiency of IMS and sucrose floatation methods to recover the spiked Cryptosporidium oocysts in various turbidity water samples. Cryptosporidium oocysts concentration at 1, 101, 102, and 103 per 10 ?l were spiked into 3 sets of 10 ml-water turbidity (5, 50, and 500 NTU). The recovery rate of the 2 methods was not different. Oocyst load at the concentration < 102 per 10 ml yielded unreliable results. Water turbidity at 500 NTU decreased the recovery rate of both techniques. The combination of sucrose floatation and immunofluorescense assay techniques (SF-FA) showed higher recovery rate than IMS and immunofluorescense assay (IMS-FA). We used this SF-FA to detect Cryptosporidium and Giardia from the river water samples and found 9 and 19 out of 30 (30% and 63.3%) positive, respectively. Our results favored sucrose floatation technique enhanced with immunofluorescense assay for detecting contaminated protozoa in water samples in general laboratories and in the real practical setting.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Treatment of esophagogastric intussusception due to cryptosporidiosis using paromomycin in a corn snake (Pantherophis guttatus) Urarako SHIMIZU, Manabu KURIHARA, Kenichi TAMUKAI, Kazutaka YAMADA Journal of Veterinary Medical Science.2025; 87(4): 389. CrossRef
Improved recovery of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in water by optimizing immunomagnetic separation using acid and heat dissociation Eun-Sook Lee, Ji-Yeon Lee, Young-Ae Baek, Seok-Ju Cho Journal of Water and Health.2025; 23(6): 757. CrossRef
A smartphone microscopic method for simultaneous detection of (oo)cysts of Cryptosporidium and Giardia Retina Shrestha, Rojina Duwal, Sajeev Wagle, Samiksha Pokhrel, Basant Giri, Bhanu Bhakta Neupane, Joseph Mathu Ndung'u PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.2020; 14(9): e0008560. CrossRef
Implications of new legislation (US FSMA) and guidelines (EC) on the establishment of management systems for agricultural water A. Allende, A.R. Datta, W.A. Smith, R. Adonis, A. MacKay, A.D. Adell Food Microbiology.2018; 75: 119. CrossRef
Cryptosporidium and Giardia in Wastewater and Surface Water Environments Kerry A. Hamilton, Monique Waso, Brandon Reyneke, Nazanin Saeidi, Audrey Levine, Cindy Lalancette, Marie‐Claude Besner, Wesaal Khan, Warish Ahmed Journal of Environmental Quality.2018; 47(5): 1006. CrossRef
Evolution of monitoring for Giardia and Cryptosporidium in water Artemis Efstratiou, Jerry Ongerth, Panagiotis Karanis Water Research.2017; 123: 96. CrossRef
Rapid concentration and sensitive detection of hookworm ova from wastewater matrices using a real-time PCR method P. Gyawali, J.P.S. Sidhu, W. Ahmed, P. Jagals, S. Toze Experimental Parasitology.2015; 159: 5. CrossRef
Prevalence and distribution of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in wastewater and the surface, drinking and ground waters in the Lower Rhine, Germany C. GALLAS-LINDEMANN, I. SOTIRIADOU, J. PLUTZER, P. KARANIS Epidemiology and Infection.2013; 141(1): 9. CrossRef
