Skip to main navigation Skip to main content
  • KSPTM
  • E-Submission

PHD : Parasites, Hosts and Diseases

OPEN ACCESS
ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
FOR CONTRIBUTORS

Articles

Original Article

Prevalence of Cryptosporidium-Associated Diarrhea in a High Altitude-Community of Saudi Arabia Detected by Conventional and Molecular Methods

The Korean Journal of Parasitology 2014;52(5):479-485.
Published online: October 22, 2014

1Department of Medical Parasitology, NLI, Menoufia University, Shebin El-Koom, Menoufia, Egypt.

2Department of Medical Laboratory Science, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

3Department of Nursing, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

4Department of Community Medicine, NLI, Menoufia University, Shebin El-Koom, Menoufia, Egypt.

Corresponding author (yousryhawash@gmail.com)
• Received: April 28, 2014   • Revised: June 26, 2014   • Accepted: July 15, 2014

© 2014, Korean Society for Parasitology and Tropical Medicine

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

  • 11,124 Views
  • 110 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 8 Crossref
  • 14 Scopus
prev next

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  Crossref logo
  • Intestinal Parasitic Infections Among Pediatric Patients in a Metropolitan City of Bangladesh With Emphasis on Cryptosporidiosis
    Nusrat Jahan Nipa, Nasima Aktar, Hasina M Hira, Farhana Akter, Dilshad Jahan, Salequl Islam, Ayukafangha Etando, Adnan Abdullah, Kona Chowdhury, Rahnuma Ahmad, Ahsanul Haq, Mainul Haque
    Cureus.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cryptosporidium and Cryptosporidiosis: The Perspective from the Gulf Countries
    Shahira A. Ahmed, Panagiotis Karanis
    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2020; 17(18): 6824.     CrossRef
  • Foodborne intestinal protozoan infection and associated factors among patients with watery diarrhea in Northern Ethiopia; a cross-sectional study
    Birhane Berhe, Gessessew Bugssa, Sena Bayisa, Megbaru Alemu
    Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Human cryptosporidiosis in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Reza Berahmat, Adel Spotin, Ehsan Ahmadpour, Mahmoud Mahami-Oskouei, Azim Rezamand, Nayyereh Aminisani, Morteza Ghojazadeh, Roghayeh Ghoyounchi, Tahereh Mikaeili-Galeh
    Parasitology Research.2017; 116(4): 1111.     CrossRef
  • Cryptosporidium and Giardia Infections in Children
    Blandina T. Mmbaga, Eric R. Houpt
    Pediatric Clinics of North America.2017; 64(4): 837.     CrossRef
  • High Frequency of Enteric Protozoan, Viral, and Bacterial Potential Pathogens in Community-Acquired Acute Diarrheal Episodes: Evidence Based on Results of Luminex Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel Assay
    Yousry A. Hawash, Khadiga A. Ismail, Mazen Almehmadi
    The Korean Journal of Parasitology.2017; 55(5): 513.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of microscopic and molecular tools for the diagnosis and follow-up of cryptosporidiosis in patients at risk
    Y. Le Govic, K. Guyot, G. Certad, A. Deschildre, R. Novo, C. Mary, B. Sendid, E. Viscogliosi, L. Favennec, E. Dei-Cas, E. Fréalle, E. Dutoit
    European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases.2016; 35(1): 137.     CrossRef
  • Genetic characterization of Cryptosporidium in animal and human isolates from Jordan
    Nawal Hijjawi, Rami Mukbel, Rongchang Yang, Una Ryan
    Veterinary Parasitology.2016; 228: 116.     CrossRef

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

Include:

Prevalence of Cryptosporidium-Associated Diarrhea in a High Altitude-Community of Saudi Arabia Detected by Conventional and Molecular Methods
Korean J Parasitol. 2014;52(5):479-485.   Published online October 22, 2014
Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:
Include:
Prevalence of Cryptosporidium-Associated Diarrhea in a High Altitude-Community of Saudi Arabia Detected by Conventional and Molecular Methods
Korean J Parasitol. 2014;52(5):479-485.   Published online October 22, 2014
Close

Figure

  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
Prevalence of Cryptosporidium-Associated Diarrhea in a High Altitude-Community of Saudi Arabia Detected by Conventional and Molecular Methods
Image Image Image
Fig. 1 Microscopic picture of Cryptosporidium oocysts (red) in a wet mount smear prepared from a fecal specimen concentrated by modified formol-ether method and stained following the modified Zeihl Neelsen procedure (×400 magnification).
Fig. 2 Representative ethidium bromide-stained 1% agarose gel electrophoresis picture showing the PCR test results of 12 samples (Lane 1-12) diagnosed as Cryptosporidium-negative by the LF test. M: GeneRuler™ 100 bp DNA marker; Lanes 1, 3, and 12: PCR products, ≈550 bp each, recovered from Cryptosporidium DNA-positive samples. Lane 2, 4-11: Cryptosporidium DNA-negative samples. Lane 13: PCR-negative control (master mix without template DNA).
Fig. 3 Age-distribution of 4 patients diagnosed as Cryptosporidium-negative by microscopy and proved to be positive by the PCR assay.
Prevalence of Cryptosporidium-Associated Diarrhea in a High Altitude-Community of Saudi Arabia Detected by Conventional and Molecular Methods
Microscopy LF test
Total
P-value Positive
Negative
No. of samples % No. of samples % No. of samples % Positive 17 100 0 0 17 100 P = 0.0000b Negative 1a 0.6 162 99.4 163 100 Total 18 10.0 162 90.0 180 100 Microscopy PCR assay
Total
P-value Positive
Negative
No. of samples % No. of samples % No. of samples % Positive 17 100 0 0 17 100 P = 0.0000b Negative 4a 2.5 159 97.5 163 100 Total 21 11.6 159 88.4 180 100 LF test PCR assay
Total
P value Positive
Negative
No. of samples % No. of samples % No. of samples % Positive 18 100 0 0 18 100 P = 0.0000b Negative 3a 1.9 159 98.1 163 100 Total 21 11.6 159 88.4 180 100 Age groups PCR test results
Total
P-value Positive
Negative
No. of samples % No. of samples % No. of samples % < 5 years 11 22.0 39 78.0 50 100 χ2 = 8.11 5-9 years 5 11.1 40 88.9 45 100 P = 0.004 10-39 years 4 10.0 36 90.0 40 100 40-59 years 0 0 20 100 20 100 ≥ 60 years 1 4.0 24 96.0 25 100 Total 21 11.7 159 88.3 180 100 Gender PCR test results
Total
P value of difference Positive
Negative
No. of samples % No. of samples % No. of samples % Males 12 16.2 62 83.8 74 100 χ2 = 2.5 Females 9 8.5 97 91.5 106 100 P = 0.11 Total 21 11.7 159 88.3 180 100 Diagnostic test Test results
Test diagnostic performance parameters (%)
Positive
Negative
SE SP NPV PPV (No.) (%) (No.) (%) Microscopy 17 9.4 163 90.6 81.0 100 97.6 100 LF test 18 10.0 162 90.0 85.7 100 98.2 100 PCR test 21 11.6 159 88.3 - - - -
Table 1. Concordance (number and percentage) of the microscopy results with the LF test

One sample showed a discordance result (negative by microscopy but positive by the LF test) and proved to be positive by PCR.

Highly significant by Fisher’s exact test.

Table 2. Concordance (number and percentage) of microscopy results with the PCR assay

Samples showed discordance results (these 4 samples were oocyst-negative by microscopy but proved to be Cryptosporidium DNA-positive by PCR).

Highly significant by Fisher’s exact test.

Table 3. Concordance (number and percentage) of the LF test results with the PCR assay

Samples with discordance results (i.e., these 3 samples were negative for Cryptosporidium oocysts by microscopy as well as by the LF test but proved to be positive for DNA by the PCR assay).

Highly significant by Fisher’s exact test.

Table 4. PCR test results of 180 samples distributed by age groups
Table 5. PCR test results (number and percentage) distributed by gender
Table 6. The diagnostic performance of microscopy and the LF test versus the PCR test results

SE, sensitivity; SP, specificity; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.