Development of a Rapid Diagnostic Test Kit to Detect IgG/IgM Antibody against Zika Virus Using Monoclonal Antibodies to the Envelope and Non-structural Protein 1 of the Virus
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
We developed a Rapid Diagnostic Test (RDT) kit for detecting IgG/IgM antibodies against Zika virus (ZIKV) using monoclonal antibodies to the envelope (E) and non-structural protein 1 (NS1) of ZIKV. These proteins were produced using baculovirus expression vector with Sf9 cells. Monoclonal antibodies J2G7 to NS1 and J5E1 to E protein were selected and conjugated with colloidal gold to produce the Zika IgG/IgM RDT kit (Zika RDT). Comparisons with ELISA, plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT), and PCR were done to investigate the analytical sensitivity of Zika RDT, which resulted in 100% identical results. Sensitivity and specificity of Zika RDT in a field test was determined using positive and negative samples from Brazil and Korea. The diagnostic accuracy of Zika RDT was fairly high; sensitivity and specificity for IgG was 99.0 and 99.3%, respectively, while for IgM it was 96.7 and 98.7%, respectively. Cross reaction with dengue virus was evaluated using anti-Dengue Mixed Titer Performance Panel (PVD201), in which the Zika RDT showed cross-reactions with DENV in 16.7% and 5.6% in IgG and IgM, respectively. Cross reactions were not observed with West Nile, yellow fever, and hepatitis C virus infected sera. Zika RDT kit is very simple to use, rapid to assay, and very sensitive, and highly specific. Therefore, it would serve as a choice of method for point-of-care diagnosis and large scale surveys of ZIKV infection under clinical or field conditions worldwide in endemic areas.
Zika virus (ZIKV) is a mosquito-borne, single stranded RNA flavivirus that was first identified in the Zika forest of Uganda in 1947 from Rhesus monkeys [1]. Some cases of human infection were reported in Africa and Asia [2,3] before the first major outbreak on the island of Yap in the Federated States of Micronesia in 2007 [4]. ZIKV spread to the American continent [5], and its emergence was associated with the description of severe neurological complications; Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) in adults in French Polynesia and microcephaly in neonates in Brazil [6,7].
Most ZIKV-infected patients are asymptomatic [4]. On the other hand, most of those who do have them have symptoms that are almost indistinguishable from those of other causes of undifferentiated systemic febrile illness, especially dengue (DENV) and chikungunya virus infections. To further confuse the issue, these infections are also transmitted by the Aedes mosquito and are found in the same regions as ZIKV infections [8]. Furthermore, co-infections with these viruses have also been reported [9,10]. Additionally, these viral infections could share the transmission routes.
ZIKV is primarily transmitted to people through the bite of an infected Aedes mosquito, mainly Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus, which are the same mosquitoes that transmit dengue, chikungunya, and yellow fever viruses. Sexual transmission and transmission through laboratory exposure are possible, and it is also theoretically possible through blood transfusion, organ and tissue transplant, fertility treatment, and breast feeding. Interestingly, ZIKV can also be transmitted through other non-vector-borne routes, including sexual intercourse, transplacental transmission, blood product transfusion, and possibly exposure to other bodily fluids with high viral loads [8,11–14]. Thus, the diagnosis of ZIKV infection cannot be reliably established by clinical features alone.
As evidenced by a number of recently emerging viral epidemics, highly sensitive and specific laboratory diagnostics for these infections are essential for infection control measures [15–17]. Reverse transcriptase-PCR (RT-PCR) has been the most commonly used laboratory diagnostic assay for ZIKV infection worldwide. A number of specific real-time and conventional RT-PCR assays targeting the envelope (E), premembrane (prM), nonstructural proteins 1 (NS1), NS2B, NS3, and NS5 gene coding regions of the ZIKV genome have been described [18–24]. However, most of these assays were developed before the ZIKV epidemic occurred in the Americas, and there are up to 10 potential nucleotide mismatches between the sequences of the individual assays’ primers and current epidemic virus strains [25]. The low sensitivity in these assays may also lead to false-negative results in up to 20–80% of patients, especially those with low viral loads in their blood or urine [25].
Thus, laboratory diagnosis of ZIKV infection is very important, but remains challenging, due to a limited time window of possible virus detection, whereby patients tested more than 1 to 2 weeks post-symptom onset are difficult to diagnose [26–28]. There is therefore a need for an accurate diagnostic approach that will prolong the diagnostic period [29]. In this study, we developed an RDT kit (Zika RDT) for detecting IgG/IgM antibody against ZIKV using monoclonal antibodies to the E and NS1 proteins of ZIKV.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Ethics statement
This study was performed under the regulation of the IRB Committee of FEMPTEC (2016-06-01) and the IRB Committee of BahiaFarma (2016-01-02). This research adhered to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided written informed consent, and no minors were involved in the study. All procedures and handling of mice were conducted under an approved protocol by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the School of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea (CUMC-2015-0042-02, 2015–2017), which adhered to the regulations set under the Korean National Animal Protection Act.
Expression of fusion protein
Nonstructural 1 (NS1) and Envelope (E) proteins were used as diagnostic target of anti-ZIKV. The particular NS1 sequence (354 aa) and E sequence (261 aa) were obtained from the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (http://viralzone.expasy.org).
We produced recombinant NS1 and E proteins of ZIKV through recombinant baculovirus expression vector technology with Sf9 cells. The pAcGP67a-NS1-his and pAcGP67a-Env-his vectors were cloned. Briefly, Spodoptera frugiperda Sf9 cells (ATCC #CRL-1711) were grown at 27°C in Sf-900II serum-free medium (Gibco/BRL, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). The Sf9 cells were transfected with pAcGP67a-NS1-his and pAcGP67a-Env-his vector by polyfect-mediated method (Hilden, Qiagen, Germany). The cells were incubated at 27°C for 72 hr, and then infected with recombinant baculoviruses at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) 0.01–10. Following 7 days of incubation at 27°C the cells were removed from culture medium. The supernatant was collected and analyzed on SDS-PAGE and western blot. With the cold centrifugation at 3,000 g for 10 min, the collected supernatant was introduced to pre-equilibrated Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) resin (Qiagen). Elution was performed using 5 and 500 mmol/L imidazole in 20 mmol/L Tris-Cl (pH 8.0). The eluate was dialyzed using Tris-Cl (pH 8.0) for 24 hr by changing the buffer thrice. Western blot against Zika positive and anti-hIgG-HRP, and SDS-PAGE were performed after purification.
Immunization of mice with the recombinant ZIKV NS1 and E
The recombinant proteins (100 μg/250 μl) were mixed with equal volumes of Freund’s complete adjuvants (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Missouri, USA), and the mixture was injected intraperitoneally into 6-weeks-old female BALB/c mice (Samtaco, Suwon, Korea). The second and third injections were followed with the same amount of protein mixed with incomplete Freund’s adjuvant (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) in the same way at 2-week intervals. After the third immunization, the recombinant proteins (100 μg/250 μl) were injected intravenously without adjuvant.
Hybridoma cell cloning
To produce hybridoma cell-secreted monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), we used a cell fusion technique according to an established protocol [30,31]. Mouse myeloma cells (SP2/0 cell; ATCC #CRL 1581) were fused with spleen cells from the donor mice using 50% polyethylene glycol (Sigma Chemical Co.). After incubation with hypoxanthine, aminopterin, and thymidine media (Sigma Chemical Co.), supernatants of hybridoma cell culture were screened by ELISA using the recombinant ZIKV NS1 or E proteins (1 μg/ml) as an antigen. After subcloning with limiting dilutions, selected hybridoma colonies were transferred into 25 cm2 tissue culture flasks (Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) with RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco/BRL) containing 10% FBS (Gibco/BRL).
Characterization of mAbs
The mAb-containing supernatant and ascitic fluid of BALB/c mice were collected and screened using ELISA to determine the antibody properties. The mAbs were purified on a protein G agarose resin (Amicogen, Inc, Jinju, Korea) and identified using SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and western blotting. The mAb isotypes were determined using goat anti-mouse immunoglobulins (Sigma-Aldrich), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. An indirect competitive ELISA was conducted to measure the affinity of mAbs, as previously described [32]. Various concentrations of the recombinant NS1 or E antigen were incubated with mAbs for 1 hr at room temperature (RT). This antigen–antibody mixture was then transferred to wells where recombinant antigens are coated. After 1-hr incubation at RT, wells were rinsed with PBS containing 0.1% Tween-20. A 1-hr incubation was followed with anti-mouse IgG-horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate at RT and 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine solution was added after final washing. Finally, the absorbance was measured by a microplate reader (Benchmark Plus; Bio-Rad, Hercules, California, USA) at 450 nm after the termination of coloring reaction by H2SO4. Dissociation constant (Kd) was calculated by generating Klotz plot.
Preparation and interpretation of the Zika IgG/IgM RDT kit
Monoclonal antibodies J2G7 to NS1 and J5E1 to E proteins were selected from these hybridomas and then conjugated with colloidal gold particles (40 nm in mean diameter) according to a previously described procedure [33] to produce the Zika IgG/IgM RDT kit (Zika RDT; Fig. 1).
Briefly, the assay is performed by adding 5 μl of serum/plasma or 10 μl of whole blood, and 3–4 drops of the assay buffer. Reacting bands were read after 15–20 min and its density was determined arbitrarily as 0, +, ++, and +++. Definite reactivity was determined as ++ (mid), while weaker and stronger reactivity compared to it was determined as + (weak) and +++ (strong). The final results were agreed upon by 3 investigators (Fig. 2).
Evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of Zika RDT
To investigate the analytical sensitivity of RDT, comparison with ELISA, plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) and PCR was performed on 30 Zika Positive Specimens provided by the Hospital Gaffree e Guinle (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). Real-Time RT-PCR (RealStar Zika RT-PCR Kit and AccuPower ZIKA Real-Time RT-PCR Kit) is the only method officially approved and used as the gold standard diagnostic method. Supernatant samples (100 μl) or serum samples (1 μl and sample diluent 99 μl) were applied to wells of the ELISA. A sample was considered positive if the optical density (OD) at 490 nm with a spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer Victor3, Turku, Finland) was 2-fold greater than that of a blank (PBS) sample. The cut-off value was set at twice the average value of the blank sample in 3 replicates.
PRNT was performed to determine the presence of virus-specific neutralizing antibodies in paired serum samples. Briefly, Vero cells were seeded at a density of 160,000 cells/well 24 hr before infection in 6-well plates. De-complemented sera samples (30 min at 56°C) were 2 fold serially diluted from 1: 10 to 1:400 in DMEM serum-free medium. Then an equal volume of DMEM-diluted ZIKA virus containing 200 PFU was added and incubated for 1 hr at 36°C in a final volume of 200 μl. Vero cells were infected in duplicate with 100 μl of the neutralization mixture and incubated for 1 hr at 37°C. Afterwards, the viral inoculum was removed and cells were overlaid with 2 ml of DMEM with 2% FBS and 1.5% SeaPlaque agarose (Lonza). Plates were incubated at 37°C for 3–5 days. After this period, cells were washed twice with PBS, stained with 1% crystal violet for 30 min. Plaques were counted and percentage of plaque reduction against control serum was calculated.
RNA extracts from serum samples were prepared for PCR using an ExiPrep Viral RNA Kit (Bioneer Co., Daejeon, Korea). Viral RNA was extracted from 20 μl of serum and eluted in 50 μl of elution buffer. For the AccuPower ZIKV Multiplex Real-time RT-PCR assay, 5 μl of RNA extract was mixed with 45 μl of master mix, and real-time RT-PCR was performed using a PCR thermocycler (Exicycler 96 Real-Time Quantitative Thermal Block; Bioneer Co., Korea). All of the procedures were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Sensitivity and specificity of Zika RDT in field test
Positive samples were kindly provided from the Hospital Gaffree e Guinle (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) under the FEMPTEC foundation and Ministry of Bahia (Brazil), which had been collected from screening procedures in an endemic area. Negative samples were kindly provided from the Dankook University Hospital (Cheonan, Korea) for a field test using ELISA as control.
The sera of 300 positive and 300 negative samples were checked for the IgG, and 150 positive and 300 negative samples were checked for the IgM antibody titers by ELISA. The optical density (OD) of duplicated samples were measured at 490 nm with a spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer Victor3) and compensated by comparing the OD of a standard positive serum in each plate.
Cross reactions with DENV were evaluated using anti-Dengue Mixed Titer Performance Panel (PVD201). Cross reactions with West Nile, yellow fever, and hepatitis C virus (HCV) were also determined.
RESULTS
Construction of a highly specific RDT kit
ZIKV E and NS1 proteins were exposed to the surface of the virus to be candidate targets as antigens. DNA sequences for the E and NS1 each were obtained from the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (http://viralzone.expasy.org) and cloned for the 261 amino acids of E and 354 amino acids of NS1 proteins. These 2 sequences are located adjacent to each other in the genome. Using these sequences, the ZIKV proteins were successfully expressed in Sf9 cells and purified as 37 and 45 kDa of molecular weight (Fig. 3).
Monoclonal antibodies showing high affinity constant to recombinant proteins were selected among the various hybridoma types. IgG1 from hybridoma J5E1 showed a 1.5 to 10 fold strong affinity (5.55×109) to recombinant E antigen compared to isotypes from other hybridomas (3.12×108–4.02×109). On the other hand, IgG1 from hybridoma J2G7 showed an even stronger response to recombinant NS1 antigen, with a 5 to 100 fold strong affinity (3.32×109) to NS1 protein compared to isotypes from other hybridomas (0.25×108–6.22×108) (Fig. 4; Table 1).
Zika IgG/IgM RDT kit as a reliable diagnostic tool
To evaluate the usage of Zika IgG/IgM RDT kit as a reliable diagnostic tool, a comparison test using 30 Zika Mixed Titer Standards showed 100% identical results with the RDT kit against ELISA, PRNT and PCR (Fig. 5; Table 2). The diagnostic accuracy of Zika RDT as determined by sensitivity and specificity in a field test was fairly high; with sensitivity and specificity for IgG at 99.0 and 99.3%, respectively, while for IgM it was 96.7 and 98.7%, respectively (Table 3).
Cross reactions with DENV were also determined, in which Zika RDT showed cross-reaction with PVD201 in 16.7% and 5.6% in IgG and IgM, respectively from a total of 18 panels (Table 4). The results showed that all the cross reactions were identified at high titer (>8.9 s/CO) of DENV antibody positives. Fortunately, no cross-reaction with anti-West Nile virus, anti-yellow fever virus, anti-HCV were observed.
DISCUSSION
To detect ZIKV RNA early in the course of illness, real-time RT-PCR (rRT-PCR) on serum and urine has been commonly used during the first 2 weeks after onset of the illness [34]. Although a number of real-time ZIKV RT-PCR assays have been described, a recent evaluation showed that some had low sensitivity and incompatibility with currently circulating epidemic ZIKV strains belonging to the Asian/American lineage [25]. Additionally, an estimated 20–80% of ZIKV-infected patients may be undiagnosed because of the low viral loads in these patient’s clinical specimens [25]. Thus, serologic test for ZIKV to detect ZIKV-specific IgM and neutralizing antibodies have been developed. Since IgM and neutralizing antibodies against ZIKV are detectable up to 12 weeks after onset of illness, serology tests should be followed when ZIKV RNA is negative on serum and urine from suspicious ZIKV infected patients.
In the present study, we successfully applied gold conjugate for the development of a rapid diagnostic testing (RDT) system with the monoclonal antibodies J5E1 and J2G7 that correspond to the envelope (E) and non-structural 1 (NS1) proteins of ZIKV, respectively. Serological diagnosis of ZIKV is far from easy because of extensive cross-reactivity between antibodies against other flaviviruses [35]. With the baculovirus expression system, we can obtain soluble expressed and highly purified recombinant E & NS1 proteins of ZIKV, and the resultant sensitivity and specificity of Zika RDT were excellent. Zika RDT showed 100% identical results with the standard panel using ELISA and PRNT. Zika RDT requires neither electricity nor any specific laboratory equipment. It is stable at 4–30°C and has a long shelf life. It is simple to use so the assay is fast, and avoids blood being drawn from suspicious patients. These characteristics make it useful in a field setting.
However, some cross-reaction with the DENV (16.7% and 5.6% for IgG and IgM, respectively) was observed. Fortunately, there was no cross-reaction with anti-West Nile virus, anti-yellow fever virus, anti-HCV serums. While the flavivirus NS1) is secreted by infected cells and is involved in immune evasion and pathogenesis [36]. Distinct features that may be related to the ZIKV neurotropism of the E protein [37,38] and different electrostatic characteristics of the NS1 protein [39] would result in the high efficacy of our RDT and its differentiating of other flavivirus infections.
The cross-reaction with DENV represents 1 major disadvantage of the test. Presumed causes of cross-reaction of Zika RDT to DENV may be caused by mixed infection of ZIKV and DENV both in vectors and in human, and overlapping clinical symptoms make differential diagnosis a problem. ZIKV and DENV show a higher than 50% homology in E and NS1 proteins [38], and these common antigenic determinants may confuse the issue. Pre-existing immunity to prior DENV infection might also increase ZIKV replication through antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of ZIKV infection [40] causing variable results. In this context, cross-reactivity between DENV and ZIKV seems inevitable. Indeed, it has been suggested that ZIKV must be considered another member of the DENV serocomplex [40].
Zika RDT was the first to be developed, and the first to receive Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA) approval of ZIKV rapid test from the Brazilian government by the cooperation of BahiaFarma (Bahia, Brazil) and GenBody Inc. (Cheonan, Korea). As it has been proved to be effective in the field, promotion of ZIKV test for public healthcare awareness has been facilitated. The Zika RDT kit is very simple to use, rapid to assay, and very sensitive and highly specific. Therefore, it would serve as a choice of method for point-of-care diagnosis and large scale surveys of ZIKV infection among people under clinical or field conditions worldwide in endemic areas.
Though the test has been proved effective, further studies are needed to address other significant problems. Co-infection of DENV, ZIKV, chikungunya virus, and other yet unknown viral diseases need to be evaluated, and their co-infection rates determined. The need to differentiate these infections in a single sample for both clinical and epidemiologic purposes is of immediate importance and is likely to remain relevant in the future. Additionally, the relationship between ZIKV variants and severe complications such as microcephaly and Guillain-Barre syndrome also need to be addressed, and our test seems flexible enough to detect these variants.
Notes
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This research was supported by the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Korean Government (MSIP) (no. 2016M3A9B6919217).
Fig. 1
Schematic working principle and the component of ZIKV IgG/IgM RDT kit. Antibody capturing method was applied and 1 more hole for smaller sample application.
Fig. 2
Working procedure of the Zika IgG/IgM RDT kit and the results of the assay. The procedure does not require any specific technic, can be tested easily and rapidly, and showed clear results.
Fig. 3
Purification of the NS1 and envelope proteins of ZIKV proteins and confirmation of the antigenicity. Expressed proteins in Sf9 cells were purified in Ni2+-NTA resin (A) and tested for the antigenicity with a ZIKV infected serum in western blot (B).
Fig. 4
Efficacy of the cloned monoclonal antibodies against E and NS1 proteins of ZIKV in RDT kits. Each mAb was conjugated with gold particles and reacted in the test line of the purified ZIKV for selection of useful specific mAb clones.
Fig. 5
Comparison of ZIKV IgG/IgM RDT results with 30 Zika positive sera of confirmed ELISA, PRNT, and PCR results. Real lines showed positive in both IgG and IgM, dotted lines positive only in IgM, and the remainders positive only in IgG.
Table 1
Characteristics of monoclonal antibodies against ZIKV E and NS1 proteins
Sensitivity and specificity of Zika RDT in field test
Table 3
N= 600 (ZIKV IgG test)
ELISA
Total
Positive
Negative
This kit
Positive
297
2
299
Negative
3
298
301
Total
300
300
600
N= 450 (ZIKV IgM test)
ELISA
Total
Positive
Negative
This kit
Positive
145
4
149
Negative
5
296
301
Total
150
300
450
Positive samples were provided from the Hospital Gaffree e Guinle (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) and Ministry of Bahia (Brazil) in 2016. Negative samples were provided from the Dankook University Hospital (Cheonan, Korea) in 2016.
Table 4
Cross-reaction with DENV positive and negative sera of PVD201
2. Macnamara FN. Zika virus: a report on three cases of human infection during an epidemic of jaundice in Nigeria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1954;48:139-145.
4. Duffy MR, Chen TH, Hancock WT, Powers AM, Kool JL, Lanciotti RS, Pretrick M, Marfel M, Holzbauer S, Dubray C, Guillaumot L, Griggs A, Bel M, Lambert AJ, Laven J, Kosoy O, Panella A, Biggerstaff BJ, Fischer M, Hayes EB. Zika virus outbreak on Yap Island, Federated States of Micronesia. N Engl J Med 2009;360:2536-2543.
9. Pessôa R, Patriota JV, de Souza Md Lourdes, Felix AC, Mamede N, Sanabani SS. Investigation into an outbreak of dengue-like illness in Pernambuco, Brazil, revealed a cocirculation of Zika, chikungunya, and Dengue virus type 1. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e3201.
14. Calvet G, Aguiar RS, Melo ASO, Sampaio SA, de Filippis I, Fabri A, Araujo ESM, de Sequeira PC, de Mendonça MCL, de Oliveira L, Tschoeke DA, Schrago CG, Thompson FL, Brasil P, Dos Santos FB, Nogueira RMR, Tanuri A, de Filippis AMB. Detection and sequencing of Zika virus from amniotic fluid of fetuses with microcephaly in Brazil: a case study. Lancet Infect Dis 2016;16:653-660.
15. To KK, Chan JF, Chen H, Li L, Yuen KY. The emergence of influenza A H7N9 in human beings 16 years after influenza A H5N1: a tale of two cities. Lancet Infect Dis 2013;13:809-821.
22. Faye O, Faye O, Diallo D, Diallo M, Weidmann M, Sall AA. Quantitative real-time PCR detection of Zika virus and evaluation with field-caught mosquitoes. Virol J 2013;10:311.
23. Pyke AT, Daly MT, Cameron JN, Moore PR, Taylor CT, Hewitson GR, Humphreys JL, Gair R. Imported Zika virus infection from the Cook islands into Australia, 2014. PLoS Curr 2014;6.
28. Bingham AM, Cone M, Mock V, Heberlein-Larson L, Stanek D, Blackmore C, Likos A. Comparison of test results for Zika virus RNA in urine, serum, and saliva specimens from persons with travel-associated Zika virus disease - Florida, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016;65:475-478.
29. Lustig Y, Mendelson E, Paran N, Melamed S, Schwartz E. Detection of Zika virus RNA in whole blood of imported Zika virus disease cases up to 2 months after symptom onset, Israel, December 2015 to April 2016. Euro Surveill 2016;21.
32. Friguet B, Chaffotte AF, Djavadi-Ohaniance L, Goldberg ME. Measurements of the true affinity constant in solution of antigen-antibody complexes by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. J Immunol Methods 1985;77:305-319.
33. Chong CK, Jeong W, Kim HY, An DJ, Jeoung HY, Ryu JE, Ko AR, Kim YJ, Hong SJ, Yang Z, Nam HW. Development and clinical evaluation of a rapid serodiagnostic test for toxoplasmosis of cats using recombinant SAG1 antigen. Korean J Parasitol 2011;49:207-212.
34. Paz-Bailey G, Rosenberg ES, Doyle K, Munoz-Jordan J, Santiago GA, Klein L, Perez-Padilla J, Medina FA, Waterman SH, Gubern CG, Alvarado LI, Sharp TM. Persistence of Zika virus in dody fluids - preliminary report. N Engl J Med 2017.
35. Vorou R. Letter to the editor: diagnostic challenges to be considered regarding Zika virus in the context of the presence of the vector Aedes albopictus in Europe. Euro Surveill 2016;21:30161.
36. Muller DA, Young PR. The flavivirus NS1 protein: molecular and structural biology, immunology, role in pathogenesis and application as a diagnostic biomarker. Antiviral Res 2013;98:192-208.
37. Dai L, Song J, Lu X, Deng YQ, Musyoki AM, Cheng H, Zhang Y, Yuan Y, Song H, Haywood J, Xiao H, Yan J, Shi Y, Qin CF, Qi J, Gao GF. Structures of the Zika virus envelope protein and its complex with a flavivirus broadly protective antibody. Cell Host Microbe 2016;19:696-704.
The expanding toolkit of insect cell culture: a new era in biotechnology Surjeet Kumar Arya, Cynthia L Goodman, Subba Reddy Palli Current Opinion in Insect Science.2026; 74: 101465. CrossRef
Advancing point-of-care diagnostics: Engineering and enhancing sensitivity and specificity in nanoparticle-based lateral flow assays for rapid disease detection Arunima Lala, Thangapandi Kalyani, Hiranmoy Kotal, Saikat Kumar Jana Talanta.2026; 303: 129450. CrossRef
Development of a colloidal gold immunochromatographic strip to detect equine infectious anemia virus Jianzhong Wang, Jicheng Qiu, Mengmeng Wang, Xiaojie Wu, Xiaoguang Li, Heng Zhang Virology Journal.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Advances in Metallic-Based Localized Surface Plasmon Sensors for Enhanced Tropical Disease Detection: A Comprehensive Review Sajid Farooq, Denise Maria Zezell Plasmonics.2024; 19(4): 1721. CrossRef
Diagnostic accuracy of DPP Fever Panel II Asia tests for tropical fever diagnosis Sandhya Dhawan, Sabine Dittrich, Sonia Arafah, Stefano Ongarello, Aurelian Mace, Siribun Panapruksachat, Latsaniphone Boutthasavong, Aphaphone Adsamouth, Soulignasak Thongpaseuth, Viengmon Davong, Manivanh Vongsouvath, Elizabeth A. Ashley, Matthew T. Robi PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.2024; 18(4): e0012077. CrossRef
Hyperendemic Dengue and Possible Zika Circulation in the Westernmost Region of the Indonesian Archipelago Harapan Harapan, Kritu Panta, Alice Michie, Timo Ernst, Suzi McCarthy, Muhsin Muhsin, Safarianti Safarianti, Tjut Mariam Zanaria, Mudatsir Mudatsir, R. Tedjo Sasmono, Allison Imrie Viruses.2022; 14(2): 219. CrossRef
Engineered NS1 for Sensitive, Specific Zika Virus Diagnosis from Patient Serology Thai Leong Yap, Shin Yee Hong, Jun Hui Soh, Lekha Ravichandraprabhu, Vanessa W.X. Lim, Hsi-Min Chan, Tommy Z.X. Ong, Ying Ping Chua, Shi En Koh, Huajing Wang, Yee Sin Leo, Jackie Y. Ying, William Sun Emerging Infectious Diseases.2021; 27(5): 1427. CrossRef
Development and characterization of mouse monoclonal antibodies targeting to distinct epitopes of Zika virus envelope protein for specific detection of Zika virus Chia-Jung Li, Ping-Han Huang, Hui-Wen Chen, Shih-Chung Chang Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.2021; 105(11): 4663. CrossRef
Recent advances in point-of-care biosensors for the diagnosis of neglected tropical diseases Patricia Batista Deroco, Dagwin Wachholz Junior, Lauro Tatsuo Kubota Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical.2021; 349: 130821. CrossRef
Solutions against emerging infectious and noninfectious human diseases through the application of baculovirus technologies Alexandra Marisa Targovnik, Jorge Alejandro Simonin, Gregorio Juan Mc Callum, Ignacio Smith, Franco Uriel Cuccovia Warlet, María Victoria Nugnes, María Victoria Miranda, Mariano Nicolás Belaich Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.2021; 105(21-22): 8195. CrossRef
Strategies for developing sensitive and specific nanoparticle-based lateral flow assays as point-of-care diagnostic device Jun Hui Soh, Hsi-Min Chan, Jackie Y. Ying Nano Today.2020; 30: 100831. CrossRef
Evolutions and upcoming on Zika virus diagnosis through an outbreak: A systematic review Fernando A. Jorge, Mateus V. Thomazella, Deborah de Castro Moreira, Luciana D. G. Lopes, Jorge J. V. Teixeira, Dennis A. Bertolini Reviews in Medical Virology.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Zika virus serological diagnosis: commercial tests and monoclonal antibodies as tools Isaura Beatriz Borges Silva, Aldacilene Souza da Silva, Mariana Sequetin Cunha, Aline Diniz Cabral, Kelly Cristina Alves de Oliveira, Elizabeth De Gaspari, Carlos Roberto Prudencio Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
ZIKV-Specific NS1 Epitopes as Serological Markers of Acute Zika Virus Infection Yiu-Wing Kam, Juliana Almeida Leite, Siti Naqiah Amrun, Fok-Moon Lum, Wearn-Xin Yee, Farhana Abu Bakar, Kai Er Eng, David C Lye, Yee-Sin Leo, Chia-Yin Chong, Andre Ricardo Ribas Freitas, Guilherme Paier Milanez, Jose Luiz Proença-Modena, Laurent Rénia, Fa The Journal of Infectious Diseases.2019; 220(2): 203. CrossRef
Seasonal dengue surge: Providers⬨tm) perceptions about the impact of dengue on patient volume, staffing and use of point of care testing in Indian emergency departments Janice Blanchard, Katherine Douglass, Shweta Gidwani, Usha Khatri, Daniel Gaballa, Amelia Pousson, Neeraj Mangla, Jeffrey Smith Journal of Infection and Public Health.2019; 12(6): 794. CrossRef
Development and Clinical Evaluation of a Rapid Diagnostic Test for Yellow Fever Non-Structural Protein 1 Yeong Hoon Kim, Tae-Yun Kim, Ji-Seon Park, Jin Suk Park, Jihoo Lee, Joungdae Moon, Chom-Kyu Chong, Ivan Neves Junior, Fernando Raphael Ferry, Hye-Jin Ahn, Lokraj Bhatt, Ho-Woo Nam The Korean Journal of Parasitology.2019; 57(3): 283. CrossRef
Zika Fever: Development of Diagnostics, Prevention and Treatment E. I. Kazachinskaya, D. V. Shan’shin, A. V. Ivanova Problems of Particularly Dangerous Infections.2019; (2): 6. CrossRef
High correlation between Zika virus NS1 antibodies and neutralizing antibodies in selected serum samples from normal healthy Thais Wannapa Sornjai, Suwipa Ramphan, Nitwara Wikan, Prasert Auewarakul, Duncan R. Smith Scientific Reports.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Generation and Characterization of a Polyclonal Antibody Against NS1 Protein for Detection of Zika Virus Liding Zhang, Congjie Chen, Zhixin Chen, Shuzhen He, Yuzhu Song, Xueshan Xia, Qinqin Han, Jinyang Zhang Jundishapur Journal of Microbiology.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Chaperones, Membrane Trafficking and Signal Transduction Proteins Regulate Zaire Ebola Virus trVLPs and Interact With trVLP Elements Dong-Shan Yu, Tian-Hao Weng, Chen-Yu Hu, Zhi-Gang Wu, Yan-Hua Li, Lin-Fang Cheng, Nan-Ping Wu, Lan-Juan Li, Hang-Ping Yao Frontiers in Microbiology.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
Analysis of Zika virus neutralizing antibodies in normal healthy Thais Wannapa Sornjai, Janejira Jaratsittisin, Prasert Auewarakul, Nitwara Wikan, Duncan R. Smith Scientific Reports.2018;[Epub] CrossRef
Development of a Rapid Diagnostic Test Kit to Detect IgG/IgM Antibody against Zika Virus Using Monoclonal Antibodies to the Envelope and Non-structural Protein 1 of the Virus
Fig. 1
Schematic working principle and the component of ZIKV IgG/IgM RDT kit. Antibody capturing method was applied and 1 more hole for smaller sample application.
Fig. 2
Working procedure of the Zika IgG/IgM RDT kit and the results of the assay. The procedure does not require any specific technic, can be tested easily and rapidly, and showed clear results.
Fig. 3
Purification of the NS1 and envelope proteins of ZIKV proteins and confirmation of the antigenicity. Expressed proteins in Sf9 cells were purified in Ni2+-NTA resin (A) and tested for the antigenicity with a ZIKV infected serum in western blot (B).
Fig. 4
Efficacy of the cloned monoclonal antibodies against E and NS1 proteins of ZIKV in RDT kits. Each mAb was conjugated with gold particles and reacted in the test line of the purified ZIKV for selection of useful specific mAb clones.
Fig. 5
Comparison of ZIKV IgG/IgM RDT results with 30 Zika positive sera of confirmed ELISA, PRNT, and PCR results. Real lines showed positive in both IgG and IgM, dotted lines positive only in IgM, and the remainders positive only in IgG.
Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Development of a Rapid Diagnostic Test Kit to Detect IgG/IgM Antibody against Zika Virus Using Monoclonal Antibodies to the Envelope and Non-structural Protein 1 of the Virus
Characteristics of monoclonal antibodies against ZIKV E and NS1 proteins
Immunogena
Hybridoma
Isotype
Affinity constant to recombinant proteins (1/Kd)
Reactivity in rapid diagnostic kitb
ZIKV E
J5E1
IgG1
5.55×109
Yes, for gold conjugate
J1A7
IgG2a
3.12×108
Yes
J5E4
IgG1
6.13×108
Yes
A136
IgG1
4.02×109
Yes
ZIKV NS1
J2G7
IgG1
3.32×109
Yes, for gold conjugate
J3B1
IgG1
1.12×108
Yes
J10A5
IgG1
6.22×108
Yes
J16C9
IgG1
2.12×108
No
J10C6
IgM
0.25×108
Yes
aImmunogen: recombinant ZIKV envelope (E) and nonstructural 1 (NS1) proteins.
bScreening: ZIKV purified by ultracentrifugation.
Comparison test of Zika IgG/IgM RDT kit using 30 Zika positive sera
Panel no.
ELISA
PRNT
PCR
Zika IgG/IgM RDT
IgG
s/COa
IgM
s/CO
Titer
PRNT50/ml
IgG
IgM
ZV31001
Pos
15.13
Neg
0.61
Pos
>2,000
Neg
Pos
Neg
ZV31202
Pos
10.25
Neg
0.73
Pos
>2,000
Pos
Pos
Neg
ZV31803
Pos
11.63
Neg
0.61
Pos
2,000
Pos
Pos
Neg
ZV32104
Pos
7.75
Pos
3.41
Pos
>2,000
Pos
Pos
Weak Pos
ZV32405
Pos
16.25
Neg
0.98
Pos
500
Pos
Pos
Neg
ZV32506
Pos
17.75
Neg
0.73
Pos
1,000
Pos
Pos
Neg
ZV32907
Pos
15.25
Neg
0.61
Pos
2,000
Pos
Pos
Neg
ZV12908
Pos
10.25
Pos
8.29
Pos
>2,000
Pos
Pos
Pos
ZV20309
Pos
12.38
Neg
0.85
Pos
2,000
Neg
Pos
Neg
ZV20710
Pos
10.63
Neg
0.37
Pos
500
Neg
Pos
Neg
ZV20811
Pos
2.88
Neg
0.49
Pos
200
Neg
Pos
Neg
ZV18912
Pos
4.13
Pos
10.73
Pos
>2,000
Pos
Pos
Pos
ZV12013
Neg
1
Pos
10.85
Pos
100
Pos
Neg
Pos
ZV21114
Pos
15.38
Neg
0.98
Pos
2,000
Neg
Pos
Neg
ZV21315
Pos
8.25
Neg
0.61
Pos
200
Neg
Pos
Neg
ZV21516
Pos
6.75
Pos
4.02
Pos
500
Neg
Pos
Weak Pos
ZV14517
Pos
2.25
Pos
14.88
Pos
>2,000
Pos
Weak Pos
Pos
ZV83318
Pos
2.88
Pos
11.59
Pos
>2,000
Pos
Weak Pos
Pos
ZV21019
Pos
11.88
Pos
10.49
Pos
>2,000
Pos
Pos
Pos
ZV21620
Neg
17.75
Pos
9.15
Pos
1,000
Pos
Neg
Pos
ZV25421
Neg
19.5
Pos
7.2
Pos
2,000
Pos
Neg
Pos
ZV26322
Pos
3
Pos
11.83
Pos
1,000
Pos
Weak Pos
Pos
ZV29023
Pos
2.63
Pos
6.59
Pos
200
Pos
Pos
Pos
ZV25024
Pos
7.25
Neg
0.73
Pos
500
Neg
Pos
Neg
ZV26725
Pos
11.88
Neg
0.73
Pos
1,000
Neg
Pos
Neg
ZV27226
Pos
4
Neg
0.49
Pos
Not cal.
Neg
Pos
Neg
ZV27327
Pos
5.75
Neg
0.37
Pos
200
Neg
Pos
Neg
ZV28528
Pos
8.25
Neg
0.85
Pos
100
Neg
Pos
Neg
ZV29129
Pos
9.38
Neg
0.73
Pos
500
Neg
Pos
Neg
ZV29230
Pos
15
Neg
0.49
Pos
1,000
Neg
Pos
Neg
as/CO: signal per cut-off value.
Sensitivity and specificity of Zika RDT in field test
N= 600 (ZIKV IgG test)
ELISA
Total
Positive
Negative
This kit
Positive
297
2
299
Negative
3
298
301
Total
300
300
600
N= 450 (ZIKV IgM test)
ELISA
Total
Positive
Negative
This kit
Positive
145
4
149
Negative
5
296
301
Total
150
300
450
Positive samples were provided from the Hospital Gaffree e Guinle (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) and Ministry of Bahia (Brazil) in 2016. Negative samples were provided from the Dankook University Hospital (Cheonan, Korea) in 2016.
Cross-reaction with DENV positive and negative sera of PVD201
Panel name
Titer (by SD DENV IgG/IgM Capture ELISA)
Zika RDT
IgG, s/COb
IgM, s/CO
ZIKV IgG
ZIKV IgM
PVD201a
PVD201-01
>8.9
6
Positive
Negative
PVD201-02
1.6
0.4, Negative
Negative
Negative
PVD201-03
1.1
0.3, Negative
Negative
Negative
PVD201-05
1.9
0.5, Negative
Negative
Negative
PVD201-06
3.4
2.6
Negative
Negative
PVD201-07
8.8
>7.7
Negative
Negative
PVD201-08
1.2
1
Negative
Negative
PVD201-09
2.1
1.2
Negative
Negative
PVD201-10
2.5
>7.7
Negative
Positive
PVD201-11
1
0.4, Negative
Negative
Negative
PVD201-12
0.7, Negative
0.4, Negative
Negative
Negative
PVD201-14
2.1
0.6, Negative
Negative
Negative
PVD201-16
2.4
6.8
Negative
Negative
PVD201-17
>8.9
5.5
Positive
Negative
PVD201-18
0.7, Negative
0.8, Negative
Negative
Negative
PVD201-19
0.5, Negative
0.4, Negative
Negative
Negative
PVD201-20
3
>7.7
Negative
Negative
PVD201-21
>8.9
3.9
Positive
Negative
aanti-Dengue Mixed Titer Perform Panel.
bs/CO, signal per cut-off ratio measured by ELISA.
All 4 serotypes of DENV are contained in the panels.
Table 1
Characteristics of monoclonal antibodies against ZIKV E and NS1 proteins
Immunogen: recombinant ZIKV envelope (E) and nonstructural 1 (NS1) proteins.
Screening: ZIKV purified by ultracentrifugation.
Table 2
Comparison test of Zika IgG/IgM RDT kit using 30 Zika positive sera
s/CO: signal per cut-off value.
Table 3
Sensitivity and specificity of Zika RDT in field test
Positive samples were provided from the Hospital Gaffree e Guinle (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) and Ministry of Bahia (Brazil) in 2016. Negative samples were provided from the Dankook University Hospital (Cheonan, Korea) in 2016.
Table 4
Cross-reaction with DENV positive and negative sera of PVD201
anti-Dengue Mixed Titer Perform Panel.
s/CO, signal per cut-off ratio measured by ELISA.
All 4 serotypes of DENV are contained in the panels.
