Abstract
The present study observed the resistance to reinfection with Clonorchis sinensis in various experimental animals including mice, guinea pigs, rabbits, and dogs, as well as rats and hamsters. The resistance rates to reinfection in rats, mice, hamsters, guinea pigs, rabbits, and dogs were 79.7%, 58.0%, -12.6%, 54.8%, 62.6%, and 6.0%, respectively. Worms recovered from reinfected rats and mice were immature, and significantly smaller than those from the primarily infected (P < 0.01), whereas those from other animals were fully matured to adults. These findings indicate that the protective response against reinfection with C. sinensis is prominent in rats and mice, and that they may be a good animal model to investigate the mechanism of resistance to reinfection with C. sinensis.
-
Key words: Clonorchis sinensis, liver fluke, reinfection, resistance, rats, mice
Based on epidemiological studies, humans are known to be repeatedly infected with
C. sinensis by frequent consumption of raw freshwater fish in endemic areas (
Hong et al., 1994), and reinfection or superinfection readily occurs in human with ongoing exposure, resulting in serious morbidity if untreated. On the contrary, rats develop high level of protection against reinfection with
C. sinensis, which dramatically increased by higher worm burden or longer duration of the primary infection (
Chung et al., 2004). However, hamsters are not resistant to reinfection with
C. sinensis (
Chung et al., 2004). These findings suggest that the resistance to reinfection with
C. sinensis should vary according to the host species. The present study was undertaken to investigate the resistance to reinfection with
C. sinensis in various experimental animals including mice, guinea pigs, rabbits, and dogs, as well as rats and hamsters.
Metacercariae of
C. sinensis were isolated from the naturally infected freshwater fish,
Pseudorasbora parva, collected in a pond of Jinju-si, Gyeongsangnam-do (Province), Korea. Experimental animals were all males and 5-week old, except for rats (4-week old). They were Sprague-Dawley rats, FVB mice, Syrian golden hamsters, guinea pigs, New Zealand white rabbits and dogs, and divided into 2 experimental groups; reinfection control, and reinfection groups. Animals in the reinfection groups were orally infected with metacercariae using a gavage needle according to the experimental schedule (
Fig. 1), and treated with praziquantel (Distocide®, Shinpoong Pharmaceutical Co., Seoul, Korea) 4 weeks after the primary infection. Animals in both reinfection control and reinfection groups were infected with the same number of metacercariae, and then sacrificed by deep anesthesia and cervical dislocation at 6 week post-reinfection. Adult worms were recovered from the liver of animals under a stereomicroscope, and worm recovery and resistance rates were determined as described previously (
Chung et al., 2004). The body size of recovered worms was measured after acetocarmine staining.
To guarantee the same degree of metacercarial infectivity between the 2 experimental groups, animals in reinfection control groups were infected with the same batch of
C. sinensis metacercariae that were used for reinfection groups. Therefore, they were actually primarily infected animals, and their worm recovery rates were compared with those of reinfection groups. The determined resistance rates to reinfection in rats, mice, hamsters, guinea pigs, rabbits, and dogs were 79.7%, 58.0%, -12.6%, 54.8%, 62.6%, and 6.0%, respectively (
Table 1). When the body size of worms recovered from reinfected animals were compared to those from the primarily infected, the flukes from hamsters, guinea pigs, rabbits, and dogs were similar in size (data not shown). However, the flukes from reinfected rats and mice were significantly smaller than those from the primarily infected. The average body size of recovered worms from primarily infected rats was 2.47 × 1.0 mm, while that of worms from reinfected rats was 0.58 × 0.28 mm (
P < 0.01), and all of them were immature.
The present study confirms again that rats are highly resistant to reinfection with
C. sinensis, which corresponds well with the previous report (
Chung et al., 2004). In addition to rats, mice, guinea pigs and rabbits also showed decreased worm recovery rates in reinfection with
C. sinensis, while hamsters and dogs developed no protective response against reinfection.
Rats are also known to be resistant to reinfection with
Fasciola hepatica and
Schistosoma mansoni, with which acquired immunity is closely related (
Doy et al., 1978;
Cetre et al., 1999). The mechanism of resistance to reinfection with
C. sinensis in rats is not clear, however, the immunity has been suggested to be related with resistance to reinfection (
Chung et al., 2004). When the immunity of infected rats was suppressed by methylprednisolone after chemotherapy, the worm recovery rate of the reinfected immunosuppressed rats was restored to that of the primarily infected rats, and worms were fully matured to adults. In the present study, poor development of worms was found in reinfected resistant rats, which suggests that protective immunity induced by the primary infection in the reinfected rats severely impairs the development of
C. sinensis at reinfection (
Chung et al., 2004). However, it remains to be explored which components of the host immunity are responsible for the resistance in rats reinfected with
C. sinensis.
Interestingly, hamsters showed opposite responses in reinfection, depending on the species of 2 closely related liver flukes,
C. sinensis and
Opisthorchis viverrini. Hamsters were reported resistant to reinfection with
O. viverrini (
Flavell, 1982), but not to reinfection with
C. sinensis (
Chung et al., 2004). This phenomenon was confirmed again in the present study; however, it is difficult to explain why hamsters develop different responses to reinfection of the 2 liver flukes. Furthermore, several studies reported contradictory data on the protective immunity against reinfection with
O. viverrini in hamsters. Prior infection with
O. viverrini did not protect hamsters against reinfection by the same parasite (
Sirisinha et al., 1983), and adoptive transfer of spleen cells and sera from infected hamsters produced a moderate, but insignificant reduction in the worm burden in recipient hamsters (
Flavell et al., 1980).
In clonorchiasis of mice, the susceptibility of mice to
C. sinensis infection is different according to the mouse strain (
Choi et al., 2003). FVB mice are susceptible to
C. sinensis infection, while BALB/c mice are relatively unsusceptible. This susceptibility variation has been suggested to be associated with Th2 cytokine production, especially IL-4 in FVB mice, and FVB mice showed significantly higher serum IgE level than BALB/c mice (
Choi et al., 2003). According to the susceptibility, FVB mice were selected to find out the presence of resistance to reinfection in mice in this study. The FVB mice showed reduced worm recovery and poor development of recovered worms, suggesting significant resistance to reinfection with
C. sinensis, although it was not as high as that of rats.
A reduced worm burden, delayed development of worms and decreased fecundity are indices of resistance in animals infected with helminths (
Garcia et al., 1983;
Claerebout and Vercruysse, 2000;
Chung et al., 2004). In the present study, guinea pigs and rabbits showed significantly lower worm recovery in reinfection than in the primary infection, but the recovered worms developed well. Guinea pigs and rabbits acquired resistance to reinfection, but the effect was limited only to the recovery of worms. That is different from the dual effects of resistance to reinfection in rats and mice. Therefore, it is clear that the resistance to reinfection with
C. sinensis is extremely variable by host species. This discrepancy between recovery and development of worms has been also found in pigs which were repeatedly infected with
Oesophagostomum quadrispinulatum, a porcine nodular worm. The pigs showed a lower worm burden, but normally developed worms (
Talvik et al., 1998). It needs further investigation to clarify the relationship between the resistance to reinfection and worm development.
In conclusion, rats and mice are resistant to reinfection with C. sinensis by low recovery and impaired development of reinfected worms. However, guinea pigs and rabbits show only low recovery. Rats and mice are good animal models for investigation of resistance mechanism to reinfection with C. sinensis.
Notes
-
This work was supported by the Korea Research Foundation Grant funded by the Korean Government (KRF-2003-042-E00034).
References
Fig. 1Experimental scheme for observation of resistance to reinfection with Clonorchis sinensis in various experimental animals. 1° infection, primary infection; PZQ Tx, praziquantel treatment; mc, metacercariae.
Table 1.Worm recovery rates and resistance rates to reinfection with Clonorchis sinensis in experimental animals
Table 1.
|
Animals |
Experimental groups |
No. of animals |
Worm recovery rate (%)a)
|
Resistance rate (%) |
|
Rats |
Reinfection control |
10 |
63.9 ± 20.4 |
- |
|
Reinfection |
8 |
13.0 ± 6.9b)
|
79.7 |
|
Mice |
Reinfection control |
11 |
17.6 ± 13.0 |
- |
|
Reinfection |
13 |
7.4 ± 6.1b)
|
58.0 |
|
Hamsters |
Reinfection control |
9 |
68.0 ± 15.0 |
- |
|
Reinfection |
9 |
77.8 ± 30.2 |
-12.6 |
|
Guinea pigs |
Reinfection control |
10 |
34.7 ± 13.7 |
- |
|
Reinfection |
7 |
15.7 ± 12.2b)
|
54.8 |
|
Rabbits |
Reinfection control |
7 |
35.0 ± 7.6 |
- |
|
Reinfection |
7 |
13.1 ± 8.2b)
|
62.6 |
|
Dogs |
Reinfection control |
3 |
41.6 ± 14.5 |
- |
|
Reinfection |
4 |
39.1 ± 14.1 |
6.0 |
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
- Clonorchis sinensis and Cholangiocarcinoma
Eun-Min Kim, Sung-Tae Hong
Journal of Korean Medical Science.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - Combinatorial Treatment with Praziquantel and Curcumin Reduces Clonorchis sinensis Parasite Burden and Clonorchiasis-Associated Pathologies in Rats
Soon-Ok Lee, Ki Back Chu, Keon-Woong Yoon, Su In Heo, Jin-Ho Song, Jianhua Li, Sung-Jong Hong, Fu-Shi Quan
Pharmaceutics.2024; 16(12): 1550. CrossRef - Dose-response effects of multiple Ascaris suum exposures and their impact on lung protection during larval ascariasis
Chiara Cássia Oliveira Amorim, Denise Silva Nogueira, Ana Clara Gazzinelli-Guimarães, Thais Leal-Silva, Fernando Sérgio Barbosa, Fabrício Marcus Silva Oliveira, Lucas Rocha Kraemer, Raquel Martins de Almeida, Jorge Lucas Nascimento Souza, Luisa Mourão Dia
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.2024; 18(12): e0012678. CrossRef - Unraveling the relationship among inflammatory responses, oxidative damage, and host susceptibility to Opisthorchis viverrini infection: A comparative analysis in animal models
Sirikachorn Tangkawattana, Watcharapol Suyapoh, Nathamon Taiki, Paramin Tookampee, Ravisara Chitchak, Theerayut Thongrin, Prasarn Tangkawattana
Veterinary World.2023; : 2303. CrossRef - Immunological underpinnings of Ascaris infection, reinfection and co-infection and their associated co-morbidities
Luisa Magalhães, Denise S. Nogueira, Pedro H. Gazzinelli-Guimarães, Fabricio M. S. Oliveira, Lucas Kraemer, Ana Clara Gazzinelli-Guimarães, Flaviane Vieira-Santos, Ricardo T. Fujiwara, Lilian L. Bueno
Parasitology.2021; 148(14): 1764. CrossRef - High-quality reference genome for Clonorchis sinensis
Neil D. Young, Andreas J. Stroehlein, Liina Kinkar, Tao Wang, Woon-Mok Sohn, Bill C.H. Chang, Parwinder Kaur, David Weisz, Olga Dudchenko, Erez Lieberman Aiden, Pasi K. Korhonen, Robin B. Gasser
Genomics.2021; 113(3): 1605. CrossRef - First record of a tandem-repeat region within the mitochondrial genome of Clonorchis sinensis using a long-read sequencing approach
Liina Kinkar, Neil D. Young, Woon-Mok Sohn, Andreas J. Stroehlein, Pasi K. Korhonen, Robin B. Gasser, Stephen W. Attwood
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.2020; 14(8): e0008552. CrossRef - Perturbations of Metabolomic Profiling of Spleen From Rats Infected With Clonorchis sinensis Determined by LC-MS/MS Method
Xiaoli Zhang, Xinyi Hu, Rui Chen, Beibei Sun, Yannan Gao, Shanshan Duan, Liyan Liu, Su Han
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences.2020;[Epub] CrossRef - Improved genomic resources and new bioinformatic workflow for the carcinogenic parasite Clonorchis sinensis: Biotechnological implications
Daxi Wang, Pasi K. Korhonen, Robin B. Gasser, Neil D. Young
Biotechnology Advances.2018; 36(4): 894. CrossRef - Local immune response to primary infection and re-infection by Clonorchis sinensis in FVB mice
Eun-Min Kim, Hak Sun Yu, Yan Jin, Min-Ho Choi, Young Mee Bae, Sung-Tae Hong
Parasitology International.2017; 66(4): 436. CrossRef - Mitochondrial genomic comparison of Clonorchis sinensis from South Korea with other isolates of this species
Daxi Wang, Neil D. Young, Anson V. Koehler, Patrick Tan, Woon-Mok Sohn, Pasi K. Korhonen, Robin B. Gasser
Infection, Genetics and Evolution.2017; 51: 160. CrossRef - Multiple Exposures to Ascaris suum Induce Tissue Injury and Mixed Th2/Th17 Immune Response in Mice
Denise Silva Nogueira, Pedro Henrique Gazzinelli-Guimarães, Fernando Sérgio Barbosa, Nathália Maria Resende, Caroline Cavalcanti Silva, Luciana Maria de Oliveira, Chiara Cássia Oliveira Amorim, Fabrício Marcus Silva Oliveira, Matheus Silvério Mattos, Luca
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.2016; 10(1): e0004382. CrossRef - Pathological Lesions and Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Expressions in the Liver of Mice Experimentally Infected with <i>Clonorchis sinensis</i>
Qing-Li Yang, Ji-Qing Shen, Yan Xue, Xiao-Bing Cheng, Zhi-Hua Jiang, Yi-Chao Yang, Ying-Dan Chen, Xiao-Nong Zhou
The Korean Journal of Parasitology.2015; 53(6): 777. CrossRef - Clonorchis sinensis and clonorchiasis, an update
Sung-Tae Hong, Yueyi Fang
Parasitology International.2012; 61(1): 17. CrossRef - Strain variation in the susceptibility and immune response to Clonorchis sinensis infection in mice
Md. Hafiz Uddin, Shunyu Li, Young Mee Bae, Min-Ho Choi, Sung-Tae Hong
Parasitology International.2012; 61(1): 118. CrossRef - Unlocking the Transcriptomes of Two Carcinogenic Parasites, Clonorchis sinensis and Opisthorchis viverrini
Neil D. Young, Bronwyn E. Campbell, Ross S. Hall, Aaron R. Jex, Cinzia Cantacessi, Thewarach Laha, Woon-Mok Sohn, Banchob Sripa, Alex Loukas, Paul J. Brindley, Robin B. Gasser, Malcolm K. Jones
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases.2010; 4(6): e719. CrossRef - Identification of two ß-tubulin isotypes of Clonorchis sinensis
Shunyu Li, Sung-Jong Hong, Min-Ho Choi, Sung-Tae Hong
Parasitology Research.2009; 105(4): 1015. CrossRef - Experimental model in rats for study on transmission dynamics and evaluation of Clonorchis sinensis infection immunologically, morphologically, and pathologically
Xiaoyun Wang, Chi Liang, Wenjun Chen, Yongxiu Fan, Xuchu Hu, Jin Xu, Xinbing Yu
Parasitology Research.2009; 106(1): 15. CrossRef - Helminths and malignancy
B. J. VENNERVALD, K. POLMAN
Parasite Immunology.2009; 31(11): 686. CrossRef - Changing Patterns of Serum and Bile Antibodies in Re-infected Rats with Clonorchis sinensis
Hongman Zhang, Byung-Suk Chung, Shunyu Li, Min-Ho Choi, Sung-Tae Hong
The Korean Journal of Parasitology.2008; 46(1): 17. CrossRef - Fas/FasL-dependent apoptosis of hepatocytes induced in rat and patients with Clonorchis sinensis infection
Xiaoli Zhang, Zhanfeng Jin, Rong Da, Yunxia Dong, Wuqi Song, Xiaobei Chen, Qi Huang, Hong Ling, Yang Che, Yihong Li, Fengmin Zhang
Parasitology Research.2008; 103(2): 393. CrossRef - Factors in the resistance of rats to re-infection and super-infection by Clonorchis sinensis
Hongman Zhang, Byung-Suk Chung, Shunyu Li, Min-Ho Choi, Sung-Tae Hong
Parasitology Research.2008; 102(6): 1111. CrossRef
