Warning: mkdir(): Permission denied in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 81

Warning: fopen(upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-04.txt): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 83

Warning: fwrite() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/virtual/lib/view_data.php on line 84
Geographical Distribution of Taenia asiatica and Related Species
| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact us |  
top_img
Korean J Parasito Search

CLOSE

Korean J Parasito > Volume 47(Suppl):2009 > Article
Eom, Jeon, and Rim: Geographical Distribution of Taenia asiatica and Related Species

Abstract

Geographical information of Taenia asiatica is reviewed together with that of T. solium and T. saginata. Current distribution of T. asiatica was found to be mostly from Asian countries: the Republic of Korea, China, Taiwan, Indonesia, and Thailand. Molecular genotypic techniques have found out more countries with T. asiatica from Japan, the Philippines, and Vietnam. Specimens used in this paper were collected from around the world and mostly during international collaboration projects of Korean foundations for parasite control activities (1995-2009) in developing countries.

INTRODUCTION

Taenia solium, T. saginata, and T. asiatica are 3 zoonotic tapeworms which induce human infections through pigs and cattle as intermediate hosts. Among them, T. asiatica is the last known species found in Asian countries where rural people eat undercooked visceral organs of pigs, i.e., the liver, omentum, serosa, and lung [1-4].
The original description of this tapeworm was based on morphological features of an unarmed rostellum, a large number of uterine buds, and posterior protuberances on the gravid proglottids in the adult stage and wart-like formations on the external surface of the bladder wall in the larval stage (called Cysticercus viscerotropica) [5]. Its morphological similarity to T. saginata evoked taxonomic problems arguing that it should be considered as a subspecies of T. saginata. Genetic studies, however, evidenced the species level difference of this tapeworm [6,7]. Mapping study of Taenia tapeworm mtDNA and followed sequence analysis of full mitochondrial genomes of both tapeworms provided further evidences on the validity of T. asiatica by comparing them with that of T. solium [8-10]. All of these results made us possible to develop molecular tools for differential diagnosis of Taenia tapeworms and for application to the survey works of international collaboration projects.
T. solium and T. saginata distribute worldwide as is well known. On the other hand, T. asiatica is found mostly in Asian countries, such as, Taiwan, the Republic of Korea, Indonesia, China, Thailand, Vietnam, Japan, and the Philippines. During the last 14 years, international collaboration projects for parasite control were done with several different collaboration funds of Korea on which this article and data mostly depends. The projects include Korea-China collaborating project (1st) on control strategies for helminthiases in pilot areas (1995-1999) by Korea Association of Health Promotion (KAHP) and Korea International Cooperation Agency (KOICA), Korea-China collaborative project (2nd) of control strategies for helminthiases in pilot areas (2000-2004) by KAHP and KOICA, intestinal parasite control among primary school children in Lao PDR (2000-2004) by KAHP and KOICA, Korea-Lao PDR collaborative project for control of food-borne trematode infections (especially opisthorchiasis) in Lao PDR (2007-2011) by Korean Foundation for International Healthcare (KFIH) and KOICA, the cooperative project on health promotion of Cambodian school children by intestinal parasite control (2006-2008) by KAHP and KOICA, intestinal parasite control in the southwestern area of Cambodia (2009) by KAHP and KOICA, Korea-Tanzania collaborative project on health promotion through parasite control among school children (2005-2009) by Good Neighbors International (GNI) and KOICA, and Korea-Tanzania collaboration project on neglected tropical disease control in Mwanza (2008-2013) by GNI and KOICA.
The present authors participated in those projects from the beginning and were interested in Taenia tapeworms, especially on the distribution of T. asiatica as well as with other helminthic infections. Beef and pork tapeworms were found from most of the countries which we collaborated together and T. asiatica was found from mainland China which was the first record in China (see below). This review paper depends on the data obtained by several parasitological techniques classical or molecular and is going to mention some data on T. asiatica from the countries that we had project together as well as the countries which were not subjected to the relevant projects; Japan, the Philippines, Mongolia, Vietnam, Indonesia, Thailand, and Taiwan. Interestingly, T. asiatica was found also from specimens of Japan and the Philippines by analyzing them in the laboratory (Details of this will be published elsewhere).
T. asiatica is now recognized from Korea, China, Taiwan, Thailand, Indonesia, Vietnam, Japan, and the Philippines thus far. Besides the classical methodologies for parasitological examination, genome map and full sequence of mitochondrial DNA were analyzed prior to develop strong and effective molecular tools for differential diagnosis of the tapeworm species.

DEVELOPMENT OF TOOLS FOR GENOTYPING

Mapping of mtDNA

The whole mitochondrial genomes of T. asiatica and T. saginata were amplified and cloned [10]. Both of them were approximately 14 kb in size. The restriction enzyme map of T. saginata mtDNA was constructed from the restriction fragments: 8, 4, and 2 kb, BglII; 4.5, 3.8, 1.5, and 1 kb, HincII; 5, 4.5, 2, and 1.5 kb, HindIII; 9 and 4 kb, PvuII; 12 and 1.8 kb, XhoI. Enzyme sites were not available for BamHI, EcoRI, EcoRV, KpnI or PstI in T. saginata mtDNA. Between T. asiatica and T. saginata, the migration distances of the mtDNA fragments were observed from 46 fragments, including 12 fragments shared. The sequence divergence between T. asiatica and T. saginata was estimated as much as 4.8%. The full length of the mitochondrial cox1 and cob sequences were 1,620 and 1,068 bp in T. asiatica and T. saginata, respectively. The sequence difference between the 2 species was calculated as 4.6% in the cox1 and 4.1% in the cob genes. Two variant nucleotide positions (0.1% of total length) were detected in the cox1 gene among the 5 T. asiatica isolates from China, the Philippines and Korea, whereas 13 variant nucleotide positions (0.2 to 0.8% of total length) were detected in the 10 T. saginata isolates from China, Ethiopia, France, Indonesia, Japan, Korea, Laos, the Philippines, Taiwan, Thailand and Swiss [11].

Complete sequence of T. asiatica mtDNA

The complete T. asiatica mitochondrial genome was 13,703 bp long and composed of 36 genes: 12 protein-encoding (3 subunit of cytochrome c oxidase, cox1, cox2 and cox3; 1 subunit of cytochrome b, cob; 7 subunit of NADH dehydrogenase, nad1, nad2, nad3, nad4, nad4L, nad5 and nad6; and 1 subunit of ATP synthase, atp6), 2 small and large subunit ribosomal RNA, 22 transfer RNA genes and a short non-coding region [8]. The tRNA genes were 61-69 bp long, and the secondary structures of 18 tRNAs had typical clover-leaf shapes with paired DHU arms. However, trnC, trnS1, trnS2 and trnR had unpaired DHU arms that were 7-12 bp in length. The tRNAs that transferred serine lacked a DHU arm. The non-coding region was composed of a short non-coding region of 72 nucleotides with a long non-coding region of 176 nucleotides separated by a trnL1/, trnS2/, trnL2/, trnR/, nad5 gene cluster. The sequence of the cox1 gene between T. asiatica and T. saginata differed by 4.6%, while the T. asiatica cytb gene differ by 4.1% and 12.9% from the cytb genes of T. saginata and T. solium, respectively [8].

Comparing mtDNA of T. asiaica with T. saginata and T. solium

The protein-coding sequences of T. saginata and T. asiatica contain 10,104 bps and 3,368 codons, while 10,048 bps and 3,349 codons in T. solium [9]. Twelve protein-coding genes of T. saginata and T. asiatica differed by 4.6%, while the overall difference between T. saginata and T. asiatica in the entire mtDNA sequence was 4.6%. Divergences in the mt genomes among the Taenia tapeworms ranged from 3.0% to 27.9%. Average pairwise similarity was about 95% in the functional regions of T. saginata and T. asiatica; and the most variable gene was nad5. Highly conservative regions were found in the subunits of cytochrome c oxidase, cytochrome b, 16S rRNA and the tRNAs. Predicted amino acid sequences of nad5 and cox1 genes exhibited 8.1% and 2.2% differences between T. saginata and T. asiatica, respectively. Two classes of functional regions can be identified in the mitochondrial genome of the 3 Taenia tapeworms: a slow-evolving region of non-synonymous substitution sites that includes tRNAs, rRNAs, and D-loop domains; and a fast-evolving region of synonymous substitution sites that includes atp6 and nad6. The overall sequence difference between T. asiatica and T. saginata was 4.6%, while that between T. saginata and T. solium was 11%. The degree of divergence in mtDNA sequence was estimated using the genetic distance of the cob gene between sister species, congeneric species and confamilial genera [12].

Primer design for Multiplex PCR to differentiate 3 Taenia species

Species-specific forward primers were designed based on the nucleotide sequences of valine transfer RNA and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2 from Taenia species [11]. They were designed to amplify different sized products: (1) Ta4978F, specific for T. asiatica (5'-GGG TTT AAG TTA TAA ATG TGA TGT-3'; nucleotides 4978 to 5001 from GenBank accession number AF445798); (2) Ts5058F, specific for T. saginata (5'-ACT ACA TTT GGT TTG TTT TTG TAG-3'; nucleotides 5058 to 5081 from AY684274); and (3) Tso7421F, specific for T. solium (5'-CTA GGC CAC TTA GTA GTT TAG TTA-3'; nucleotides 7421 to 7444 from AB086256). The reverse primer was from highly conserved region common to all of these tapeworms: Rev7915 (5'-CAT AAA ACA CTC AAA CCT TAT AGA-3'; nucleotides 5659 to 5685 from AF445798, nucleotides 5657 to 5683 from AY684274, and nucleotides 7870 to 7895 from AB086256) [11].

GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION

Most applied methodologies were the ones for detection of the eggs from stool specimens in the epidemiological surveys: Kato-Katz, Direct smear, Kato's cellophane thick smear, and Stoll's egg counting method. Formalinized specimens were analyzed selectively when they were the only affordable ones. Adult worms recovered with treatment were observed morphologically anytime when they were available. In case they were only a small part of a proglottid which was not enough for morphological observation, nucleotide sequences or multiplex PCR were applied. When only the eggs were available, multiplex PCR was applied on the fecal samples.

The Republic of Korea

Prevalence of human taeniasis was reported since 1915 in Korea. A great number of surveys were executed by many researchers thereafter but most of the surveys did not cover the whole country. Since 1971 nationwide surveys were conducted every 5 years revealing taeniid egg positives of between 0.02 and 1.9% [13]. During the period, T. saginata had been considered a dominant species over T. solium. The epidemiological profile of these Taenia species in humans remained unclear up to recent until Jeon et al. [14] reported distribution pattern of Taenia tapeworms in Korea. Morphological examination as well as partial nucleotide sequences of mitochondrial cox1 and ITS2 (internal transcribed spacer 2) were analyzed for 68 specimens from university or institute museum collections deposited since 1935 [14]. The specimens were identified as 3 T. solium, 51 T. asiatica, and 14 T. saginata (Table 1) [11,14]. Each province in Korea exhibited 1, 2, or 3 kinds of tapeworms. The distribution ratio of T. asiatica: T. saginata calculated from both morphological and molecular data was approximately 3.5 : 1. Interestingly this ratio is not much different from the estimation by Eom and Rim who predicted 4 : 1 according to the eating habit of raw foods [13]. Twenty-nine of the 68 examined specimens were preserved in 10% formalin. Most of the formalin-preserved samples yielded weak or no PCR amplification, but secondary PCR using the PCR products obtained from the first round of PCR amplifications as a template produced made it possible to use PCR product for direct sequencing. The results clearly indicate that all 3 human Taneia tapeworms are distributing together in Korea [14]. T. asiatica is dominating in Korea and the local Korean peoples get this tapeworm by eating undercooked livers and visceral organs of pigs.

China

During the period of 1998 and 2002, a total of 19,894 inhabitants belonging to 3 ethnic minorities in Guangxi Province were surveyed for Taenia tapeworms. Total 927 (4.7%) persons discharged proglottids of tapeworms. In 2002, 108 patients were treated and 117 adult tapeworms were obtained from them. Most of worms (n = 108) were found to be T. saginata, and 9 to be T. solium. Nine cases were mixed infection with both worms. Six adult tapeworms collected from 6 persons of the Zhuang minority residing in the southern part of China (Luzhai) were comparatively analyzed and were turned out to be T. asiatica (Table 1) [11,15]. Experimental infections with eggs from the isolate into the pigs produced cysticerci, each with hookletless scolex and with wart-like formations on the external surface of the bladder wall. There were rostellar protrusions on the scolices of the adult worms. Random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis using 3 arbitrary primers produced bands identical to those of the Korean T. asiatica [15]. This minority people likes to eat raw pork and raw pig liver mixed with sour sauce and salted garlic. The Luzhai people have eating habit of raw pig liver in 8.5% (77/902). Sometimes they eat the fresh raw pig liver without any seasoning right after slaughtering the pig. They live very closely with domestic animals sharing the same house. On the first floor, domestic animals and latrines usually share the same room; the second floor the host living room locates. The domestic animals always clean human feces by eating. This is very different from the customs of the Han people, the majority group, who cook meat thoroughly in boiling oil (Korea Association of Health Promotion and Korea International Cooperation Agency, 2004; Final report on the Korea-China collaborative project of control strategies for helminthiasis in pilot areas, 2000-2004).
Reports of other researchers give more information on the distribution of T. asiatica by finding out 2 cases from Lanping County, Yunnan Province which was confirmed by morphological observation and experimental infection in intermediate host animals [16]; Dali of Yunnan Province and Duyun of Guizhou Province by mitochondrial CoxI analysis of the worms [17]; and 3 cases from Tibet of Sichuan by DNA genotyping [18].

Japan

In December of 1998, Dr. Yosuke Yamane provided 3 Taenia tapeworms to the author's laboratory for a Christmas gift. The worms were kept in 10% formalin and each was attached with questionnaire sheet for detailed information asking about food and identification data. Two specimens were labeled as Taeniarhynchus saginatus, one was from inhabitant in Izumo City (male, 59-year-old) and the other from Yonago City (male, 41-year-old), and both of them were identified as T. asiatica by DNA genotyping (Table 1). PCR amplification and direct sequencing for the cox1 target fragment (349 bp in length corresponding to the positions 80-428 bp of the cox1 gene) were performed using the total genomic DNA extracted from formalin-preserved samples. PCR amplification was successful in these cases and generated high quality PCR products applicable to direct sequencing. This is the first report of this tapeworm from Japan (Details of this will be published elsewhere).

The Philippines

A case of T. asiatica was found from out of the 2 specimens examined by nucleotide sequencing of Cox1 and multiplex PCR (Table 1) [11]. The other was T. saginata. Leon commented that Taenia segments, which were identified morphologically as T. saginata, were examined for mitochondrial DNA through the courtesy of Drs. A. Ito and H. Yamasaki and finally resulted in 5 T. asiatica out of the 6 Filipino specimens [19]. Fan et al. [20] had a result of successful experimental infection in Small-Ear Miniature pigs with Taenia eggs from the Philippines. Hinz [21] already had stated that "In the Philippines the infections with T. saginata is clearly dominated in man but the extremely rare T. saginata cysticercosis in cattle and carabao constitutes a still unresolved epidemiological paradox for the Philippines. In general neither beef nor the carabao meat is often eaten by the population of the endemic area. In endemic area 92.6% of those asked, however, indicated that they ate raw pork (local food prepared as "kinilaw" or "sinugba"). The cycle of T. saginata in the endemic area did not follow the known cycle of man-Bovidaeman. In consideration of our results, we believe we are dealing with a T. saginata-like tapeworm [21]."

Taiwan

T. asiatica used to be called "Taiwan Taenia". Two of our collection demonstrated this tapeworm also with analysis of Cox1 sequencing (Table 1) [11]. Taiwanese Dr. P.C. Fan made Orchid Island (Lanyu Island) very well known among cestodologists and parasitologists while he was pioneering the research works on Taiwan Taenia, as one of the endemic areas of the tapeworm as well as the mainland Taiwan. This small island is a land of the Yami tribe who moved from South-East Asia via the Philippines 2 hundred years ago. The natural intermediate host of T. asiatica was also confirmed in Lanyu native pigs for the first time. Yeh et al. [22] described that "Food-borne parasitic zoonosis such as infections with Angiostrongylus cantonensis, Clonorchis sinensis, and T. saginata asiatica (Taenia asiatica) are not rare, but the former is seasonal and the latter 2 are ethnically and geographically associated". T. saginata and T. solium are also prevalent in Taiwan by consuming undercooked beef or pork.

Indonesia

Cox1 sequencing identified 2 specimens of our collection, both from Samosir Island in Indonesia, as T. asiatica (Table 1) [11]. This tapeworm species is already well known and the country is one of the most endemic areas of taeniasis/cysticercosis. The majority of the people are moslems, but christians predominate in East Indonesia and Hindus in Bali. The 3 major endemic areas of the taeniasis/cysticercosis in Indonesia are North Sumatra, Bali and Papua (former Irian Jaya). Endemic areas are also found in other islands, such as Timor, Flores, North Sulawesi, West Kalimantan and South Sumatra. Inhabitants of Bali eat pork and beef and cysticercosis is common. Approximately 23% of pork liver samples in Bali were found to contain T. asiatica metacestodes [23]. A total prevalence was as high as 13.0% (19/146) for T. solium taeniasis in Jayawijaya District, Papua. A 2003-2006 survey of 371 local people in Samosir Island, North Sumatra revealed 6 of 240 (2.5%) to be infected with T. asiatica: 2 of 58 (3.4%) and 4 of 182 (2.2%) cases in 2003 and 2005, respectively [24]. T. asiatica is well known in North Sumatra, especially Samosir Island in Lake Toba. T. solium and T. saginata are well known from Bali [24]. Indonesia is one of the countries which are endemic with all 3 species of human Taenia tapeworms: T. solium, T. asiatica and T. saginata.

Thailand

A specimen of our collection was identified as T. saginata by Cox1 nucleotide sequencing but sympatric distribution of T. solium, T. saginata and T. asiatica is already reported from Thailand in 2007 by Anantaphruti et al. on the basis of mitochondrial DNA analysis [11,25]. This was the first report of T. asiatica in this country. During 2002-2005, the field investigation was conducted in Thong Pha Phum District of Kanchanaburi Province which was northwest area of Thailand close to Myanmar border. Karen, a tribe, was the most surveyed population where Mon and Thai minorities reside in the mountainous terrain. Total 6 specimens, most of them had scoleces when recovered, were turned out to be T. asiatica by Cox1 gene analysis. All of them had been considered as being T. saginata morphologically before DNA genotyping. The authors stated their study indicated that 53.3% (8/15) of taeniid specimens expected to be T. saginata were actually T. asiatica and that both T. asiatica and T. saginata were co-distributed in Kanchanaburi Province. A dual infection of T. solium and T. asiatica from a patient was also confirmed clearly. In the local area, raw or inadequately cooked beef, pork, or pig viscera, and fresh blood are commonly consumed by local people in the study areas [25].

Vietnam

Taenia specimens are not available in the authors' laboratory but reports are now available from other researchers. Somers et al. [26] reported that T. asiatica (T. saginata asiatica) was the most common species (55.4%) over the T. saginata (38.5%) and T. solium (6.2%) out of 65 Taenia samples collected from patients in a referral hospital in Hanoi, North Vietnam. Species identification was done with morphological and molecular techniques: PCR-RFLP of a mitochondrial 12S rDNA [26]. Willingham and his coworkers also reported in 2003 that surveys for human taeniasis in central and northern provinces indicated a prevalence of 0.2-7.2%. In addition to T. solium and T. saginata, T. asiatica is also known to be present in Vietnam [27]. Xuan and colleagues also commented that T. asiatica was recently detected in Vietnam [28].

Mongolia

A specimen of Taenia species from 51-year-old female Mongolian was given to our laboratory by Dr. Hong Sung-Tae (Seoul National University College of Medicine, 2003). Cox1 sequence analysis and multiplex PCR genotyping classified it as T. saginata (Table 1). Since Mongolian people do not prefer eating raw pork, most of the tapeworms found in the country is T. saginata (personal communication with Dr. D. Temuulen, Health Sciences University of Mongolia School of Biomedicine, 2009). In the years 2002-2006, surveys on taeniasis/cysticercosis was conducted in Mongolia; the 118 proglottids were confirmed to be T. saginata by mitochondrial DNA analysis using cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (Cox1) and cytochrome b genes. T. saginata taeniasis was widely distributed at least in 10 of 21 provinces. No variation in the nucleotide sequences of the 2 genes was observed among T. saginata. There was no evidence of T. solium taeniasis/cysticercosis nor T. asiatica taeniasis so far [29].

Lao PDR

Total 15 specimens, 3 from Savanakhet and 12 from Khammouane, of Taenia species from our collection were analyzed by Cox1 sequence and multiplex PCR represented all of them as being T. saginata (Table 1) [11]. During the years between 2000 and 2008, helminthiases were surveyed nationwide which were funded by organizations KAHP, KOICA and KFIH. Total 37,090 subjects from 18 localities were examined for helminth eggs. Saravane revealed the highest prevalence (3.0% out of 2,869) of taeniasis over the average of 1.1% throughout the nation. Among 120 collected tapeworms by morphological and genotypical examination, 3 T. solium infections were identified from Luangprabang for the first time in the country. A male patient with neurocysticercosis was also found from Oudomxay in northern territory. A pig with T. solium metacestodes was also found from the same district. The official inspector had data of cysticerci as much as 0.59% (46/7826) in pigs, and 2.99% (44/1473) in cattle (2003-2004). Regarding the possibility of T. asiatica in Lao PDR, Phoumindr commented that "Since the neighboring countries like Thailand and Vietnam have it, T. asiatica probably exists in Laos" [30].

Cambodia

Total 21 Taenia specimens from Khokong in Cambodia were identified as being T. saginata by Cox1 sequencing and multiplex PCR (Table 1). A total of 280 stool samples were examined for helminth ova from 2007 to 2008. The overall prevalence of taeniasis was 21.7% (61/280). We performed molecular epidemiological survey on Taenia tapeworms by analysis of copro DNA in Kohkong. For DNA differential diagnosis of T. solium, T. saginata and T. asiatica eggs, multiplex PCR was used based on the nad5 gene analysis. Using oligonucleotide primers Ta7126F, Ts7313F, Tso7466F, and Rev7915, the multiplex PCR was useful for species identification based on the 706, 629, and 474 bp bands. Cambodia still remains unclear for T. asiatica.

Tanzania

T. solium (n = 1) and T. saginata (n = 4) were identified by Cox1 sequencing and multiplex PCR which were collected from Mbulu and Ijaka, Tanzania (Table 1). Fecal samples were obtained from inhabitants in Kongwa, Dodoma area in February, 2008. Total 929 subjects in Ijaka and Pembamoto with primary school students also were examined for helminth eggs using Scotch tape anal swab and Kato-Katz techniques. The overall prevalence of helminthic infection was 7.2% (67/929). The infection rate of taeniasis was 0.6% (6/929). Species identification of Taenia tapeworms was performed by multiplex PCR and nucleotide sequencing of Cox1 gene on the fecal samples containing eggs. T. solium and T. saginata were recognized from Ijaka. This area was newly recognized to be endemic for T. solium in Tanzania [31]. There was, however, no evidence of T. asiatica in Tanzania at the moment.

Other countries

Other countries, besides the Asian countries which are expected to be endemic for T. asiatica, exhibited either T. saginata or T. solium or both in morphological observations or DNA genotyping in Ethiopia, Cape Verde, Chile, Honduras, France, Poland, Switzerland, and Belgium.

CONCLUSIONS

T. asiatica is currently distributed in Asian countries, i.e., Korea, China, Taiwan, Indonesia, Thailand, Japan (DNA genotyping), the Philippines (DNA genotyping), and Vietnam (DNA genotyping). Some Asian countries, Lao PDR and Cambodia, or some more countries including Mongolia, are suspected to have endemic foci of T. asiatica in their territory-especially for some ethnic groups-but still unclear. Most of the continents other than Asia are also endemic for Taenia species and the advanced molecular techniques are expected to be applied more in the field of epidemiology for tapeworms.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Thanks are due to all collaborators, supporters and funding organizations: Drs. Min Duk-Young, Chai Jong-Yil, Yong Tai-Soon, Sohn Woon-Mok, Chu Jong-Phil, Yang Hyun-Jong, Jeong Young-Bae, Kong Yoon, Hong Sung-Tae, Joo Kyung-Hwan, Huh Sun, Park Joong-Ki, Kim Kyu-Heon, Park Hansol, Lee Dongmin, Mr. Hoang Eui-Hyug, Mr. Jeong Hoo-Gn, Mr. Bang Sung-Chul, Mr. Chang Su-Young in Korea; Drs. Yang Yichao and Li Xueming in China; Drs. Yosuke Yamane and Ito Akira in Japan; Dr. Jitra Waikagul in Thailand; Drs. Bounnaloth Insisiengmay, Sithat Insisiengmay and Bounlay Phommasack in Lao PDR; Drs. Duong Socheat, Muth Sinuon and Tep Chhakda in Cambodia; Dr. Charles Kihamia in Tanzania; Dr. Rene Houin in France; Dr. Maria Teresa Galan-Puchades in Spain; Dr. Alain de Chambrier in Switzerland; Dr. Stanny Geerts in Belgium; Drs. Eric Hoberg and Dan Zarlenga in USA; Eddy Kosin in Indonesia; Ping-Chin Fan in Taiwan; Zbigniew Pawlowski in Poland as well as for organizations-Korea Association of Health Promotion, Korea International Cooperation Agency, Good Neighbors International and Korean Foundation for International Healthcare. This work was partly supported by a research grant from Chungbuk National University in 2009. Parasite materials used in this study were provided by the Parasite Resource Bank of Korea, National Research Center (R21-2005-000-10007-0), the Republic of Korea.

REFERENCES

1. Eom KS, Rim HJ. Experimental human infection with Asian Taenia saginata metacestodes obtained from naturally infected Korean domestic pigs. Korean J Parasitol 1992;30:21-24.
crossref pmid
2. Eom KS, Rim HJ, Geerts S. Experimental infection of pigs and cattle with eggs of Asian Taenia saginata with special reference to its extrahepatic viscerotropism. Korean J Parasitol 1992;30:269-275.
crossref pmid
3. Eom KS, Rim HJ. Natural infection of Asian Taenia saginata metacestodes in the livers of Korean domestic pigs. Korean J Parasitol 1992;30:15-20.
crossref pmid
4. Fan PC, Lin CY, Chen CC, Chung WC. Morphological description of Taenia saginata asiatica (Cyclophyllidea: Taeniidae) from man in Asia. J Helminthol 1995;69:299-303. PMID: 8583124.
crossref pmid
5. Eom KS, Rim HJ. Morphologic descriptions of Taenia asiatica sp. n. Korean J Parasitol 1993;31:1-6. PMID: 8512894.
crossref pmid
6. Zarlenga DS, George M. Taenia crassiceps: cloning and mapping of mitochondrial DNA and its application to the phenetic analysis of a new species of Taenia from Southeast Asia. Exp Parasitol 1995;81:604-607. PMID: 8543003.
crossref pmid
7. De Queiroz A, Alkire NL. The phylogenetic placement of Taenia cestodes that parasitize humans. J Parasitol 1998;84:379-383. PMID: 9576516.
crossref pmid
8. Jeon HK, Lee KH, Kim KH, Hwang UW, Eom KS. Complete sequence and structure of mitochondrial genome of the human tapeworm, Taenia asiatica (Platyhelminthes; Cestoda). Parasitology 2005;130:717-726. PMID: 15977909.
crossref pmid
9. Jeon HK, Eom KS. Complete sequence of the mitochondrial genome of Taenia saginata: comparison with T. solium and T. asiatica. Parasitol Int 2007;56:243-246. PMID: 17499016.
crossref pmid
10. Jeon HK, Eom KS. Taenia asiatica and Taenia saginata: Genetic divergence estimated from their mitochondrial genomes. Exp Parasitol 2006;113:58-61. PMID: 16546174.
crossref pmid
11. Jeon HK, Chai JY, Kong Y, Waikagul J, Insisienhmay B, Rim HJ, Eom KS. Differential diagnosis of Taenia asiatica using multiplex PCR. Exp Parasitol 2009;121:151-156. PMID: 19017531.
crossref pmid
12. Herbert PDN, Ratnasingham S, deWaard JR. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proc Biol Sci 2003;270(Suppl 1):S96-S99. PMID: 12952648.

13. Eom KS, Rim HJ. Epidemiological understanding of Taenia tapeworm infections with special reference to Taenia asiatica in Korea. Korean J Parasitol 2001;39:267-283. PMID: 11775327.
crossref pmid pmc
14. Jeon HK, Kin KH, Chai JY, Yang HJ, Rim HJ, Eom KS. Sympatric distribution of the three human Taenia tapeworms collected between 1935 and 2005 in Korea. Korean J Parasitol 2008;46:235-241. PMID: 19127329.
crossref pmid pmc
15. Eom KS, Jeon HK, Kong Y, Hwang UK, Yang Y, Li X, Xu L, Feng Z, Rim HJ. Identification of Taenia asiatica in China: molecular, morphological and epidemiological analysis of a Luzhai isolate. J Parasitol 2002;88:758-764. PMID: 12197126.
crossref pmid
16. Zhang L, Tao H, Zhang B, Wang H, Wang Y, Li Z, Yang J, Yang B, Li Y, Pang Y, Zhang H, Li Y, Wu Y. First discovery of Taenia saginata asiatica infection in Yunnan province. Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi 1999;17:95-96. PMID: 12563790.
pmid
17. Wang ZR, Bao HE. Identification of Taenia saginata by mtCO I in four areas of Yunnan and Guizhou provinces. Zhongguo Ji Sheng Chong Xue Yu Ji Sheng Chong Bing Za Zhi 2003;21:20-23. PMID: 12884584.
pmid
18. Li T, Craig PS, Ito A, Chen X, Qiu D, Qiu J, Sato MO, Wandra T, Bradshaw H, Li L, Yang Y, Wang Q. Taeniasis/cysticercosis in a Tibetan population in Sichuan Province, China. Acta Trop 2006;100:223-231. PMID: 17166477.
crossref pmid
19. Leon WU. Taeniasis asiatica in the Philippines. Taeniasis/cysticercosis and echinococcosis international symposium and the 3rd congress of FAP 2005. 82.

20. Fan PC, Chung WC, Lin CY, Wu CC. Pig as a favorable animal for Taenia saginata asiatica infection. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2006;22:1-13. PMID: 16570562.
crossref pmid
21. Hinz E. Human Helminthiases in the Philippines-The Epidemiological and Geomedical Situation. 1985, Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer-Verlag. p 167.

22. Yeh TC, Lin PR, Chen ER, Shaio MF. Current status of human parasitic infections in Taiwan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 2001;34:155-160. PMID: 11605804.
pmid
23. Simanjuntak GM, Margono SS, Okamoto M, Ito A. Taeniasis/cysticercosis in Indonesia as an emerging disease. Parasitol Today 1997;13:321-323.
crossref
24. Wandra T, Depary AA, Sutisna P, Margono SS, Suroso T, Okamoto M, Craig PS, Ito A. Taeniasis and cysticercosis in Bali and North Sumatra, Indonesia. Parasitol Int 2006;55(suppl):s155-s160. PMID: 16376140.
crossref
25. Anantaphruti MT, Yamasaki H, Nakao M, Waikagul J, Watthanakulpanich D, Nuamtanong S, Maipanich W, Pubampen S, Sanguankiat S, Muennoo C, Nakaya K, Sato MO, Sako Y, Okamoto M, Ito A. Sympatric occurrence of Taenia solium, T. saginata, and T. asiatica, Thailand. Emerg Infect Dis 2007;13:1413-1416. PMID: 18252126.
crossref
26. Somers R, Dorny P, Geysen D, Nguyen LA, Thach DC, Vercruysse J, Nguyen VK. Human tapeworms in north Vietnam. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 2007;101:275-277. PMID: 16806333.
crossref pmid
27. Willingham AL 3rd, De NV, Doanh NQ, Cong le D, Dung TV, Dorny P, Cam PD, Dalsgaard A. Current status of cysticercosis in Vietnam. Southeast Asian J Trop Med and Public Health 2003;34(suppl 1):35-50. PMID: 12971506.

28. Xuan LT, Kiet NH, Thinh NV, Khuong LH, De NV. Present situation of taeniasis/cysticercosis in Vietnam. Taeniasis/cysticercosis and echinococcosis international symposium and the 3rd congress of FAP 2005. 85.

29. Myadagsuren N, Davaajav A, Wandra T, Sandar T, Ichinkhorloo P, Yamasaki H, Sako Y, Nakao M, Sato MO, Nakaya K, Ito A. Taeniasis in Mongolia, 2002-2006. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2007;77:342-346. PMID: 17690409.
pmid
30. Phoumindr N. Present situation of taeniasis/cysticercosis in Laos. Taeniasis/cysticercosis and echinococcosis international symposium and the 3rd congress of FAP 2005. 83.

31. Jeon HK, Lee KA, Chu JP, Min DY, Kihamia C, Eom KS. Differential diagnosis of Taenia tapeworms by analysis of eggs from fecal samples in Kongwa, Dodoma area in Tanzania: Finding of new endemic area of Taenia solium. XVIIth International Congress for Tropical Medicine and Malaria (abstract). 2008. 172.

Table 1.
Taenia tapeworm specimens examined by morphological characterizing and DNA genotypinga
No Species Sex/age Year Locality Preservation Genes Methods
1 T. asiatica - 1935 Seoul, Korea 10% Formalin Cox1, ITS Sequencing
2 T. asiatica M/10 1971 Chungju (Chungbuk), Korea 10% Formalin Cox1, ITS Sequencing
3 T. saginata - 1977 Korea 10% Formalin Cox1, ITS Sequencing
4 T. saginata M/36 1978 Korea 10% Formalin Cox1, ITS Sequencing
5 T. solium F/50 1979 Uijeongbu (Gyeonggi), Korea 10% Formalin Cox1, ITS Sequencing
6 T. asiatica F/52 1982 Siheung (Gyeonggi), Korea 10% Formalin Cox1, ITS Sequencing
7 T. saginata M/36 1982 Siheung (Gyeonggi), Korea 10% Formalin Cox1, ITS Sequencing
8 T. asiatica M/48 1982 Yongin (Gyeonggi), Korea 10% Formalin Cox1, ITS Sequencing
9 T. saginata M/56 1983 Nonsan (Chungnam), Korea 10% Formalin Cox1, ITS Sequencing
10 T. asiatica M/51 1983 Korea 10% Formalin Cox1, ITS Sequencing
11 T. asiatica F/51 1983 Yeoncheon (Gyeonggi), Korea 10% Formalin Cox1, ITS Sequencing
12 T. asiatica M/55 1983 Korea 10% Formalin Cox1, ITS Sequencing
13 T. asiatica M/46 1984 Korea 10% Formalin Cox1, ITS Sequencing
14 T. saginata M/45 1984 Pyeongchang (Gangwon), Korea 10% Formalin Cox1, ITS Sequencing
15 T. saginata M/44 1984 Pyeongchang (Gangwon), Korea 10% Formalin Cox1, ITS Sequencing
16 T. saginata M/64 1985 Haenam (Jeonnam), Korea 10% Formalin Cox1, ITS Sequencing
17 T. asiatica - 1986 Korea 10% Formalin Cox1, ITS Sequencing
18 T. asiatica M/29 1986 Seoul, Korea 10% Formalin Cox1, ITS Sequencing
19 T. saginata - 1988 Korea 10% Formalin Cox1, ITS Sequencing
20 T. asiatica - 1988 Jeju, Korea 10% Formalin Cox1, ITS Sequencing
21 T. asiatica - 1989 Cheongju (Chungbuk), Korea 10% Formalin Cox1, ITS Sequencing
22 T. asiatica M 1992 Gimcheon (Gyeongbuk), Korea Frozen Cox1, ITS Sequencing
23 T. asiatica M/64 1992 Gimcheon (Gyeongbuk), Korea Frozen Cox1, ITS Sequencing
24 T. asiatica F/51 1992 Gyeonggi, Korea 10% Formalin Cox1, ITS Sequencing
25 T. asiatica - 1993 Chuncheon (Gangwon), Korea Frozen Cox1, ITS Sequencing
26 T. asiatica M 1996 Wanju (Jeonbuk), Korea Frozen Cox1, ITS Sequencing
27 T. asiatica F 1997 Hwasun (Jeonnam), Korea 70% Ethanol Cox1, ITS Sequencing
28 T. asiatica M 1997 Hwasun (Jeonnam), Korea 70% Ethanol Cox1, ITS Sequencing
29 T. asiatica F 1997 Hwasun (Jeonnam), Korea 70% Ethanol Cox1, ITS Sequencing
30 T. asiatica F 1997 Hwasun (Jeonnam), Korea Frozen Cox1, ITS Sequencing
31 T. asiatica M 1997 Daegu, Korea 70% Ethanol Cox1, ITS Sequencing
32 T. asiatica M 1997 Youngju (Gyeongbuk), Korea 70% Ethanol Cox1, ITS Sequencing
33 T. asiatica M/57 1997 Wando (Jeonnam), Korea 70% Ethanol Cox1, ITS Sequencing
34 T. asiatica F/58 1997 Chuncheon (Gangwon), Korea 70% Ethanol Cox1, ITS Sequencing
35 T. asiatica F/57 1997 Wando (Jeonnam), Korea 70% Ethanol Cox1, ITS Sequencing
36 T. asiatica M/59 1998 Ansan (Gyeonggi), Korea 70% Ethanol Cox1, ITS Sequencing
37 T. saginata F/46 1998 Busan, Korea 70% Ethanol Cox1, ITS Sequencing
38 T. saginata M/57 2000 Korea 70% Ethanol Cox1, ITS Sequencing
39 T. asiatica M/49 2000 Cheonan (Chungnam), Korea Frozen Cox1, ITS Sequencing
40 T. asiatica - 2000 Jeju, Korea 70% Ethanol Cox1, ITS Sequencing
41 T. asiatica M/43 2002 Seogwipo (Jeju), Korea 70% Ethanol Cox1, ITS Sequencing
42 T. asiatica F/32 2002 Jeju, Korea 70% Ethanol Cox1, ITS Sequencing
43 T. asiatica M/81 2002 Seogwipo (Jeju), Korea 70% Ethanol Cox1, ITS Sequencing
44 T. asiatica F/48 2002 Jeju, Korea 70% Ethanol Cox1, ITS Sequencing
45 T. solium F/25 - Korea 10% Formalin Cox1, ITS Sequencing
46 T. solium M/19 - Korea 10% Formalin Cox1, ITS Sequencing
47 T. saginata - - Yongin (Gyeonggi), Korea 10% Formalin Cox1, ITS Sequencing
48 T. asiatica F 1991 Korea Frozen Cox1, ITS Sequencing
49 T. asiatica M 1991 Jeungpyeong (Chungbuk), Korea Frozen Cox1, ITS Sequencing
50 T. asiatica M - Korea Frozen Cox1, ITS Sequencing
51 T. asiatica - - Seoul, Korea Frozen Cox1, ITS Sequencing
52 T. asiatica - - Seoul, Korea Frozen Cox1, ITS Sequencing
53 T. asiatica M - Seoul, Korea Frozen Cox1, ITS Sequencing
54 T. asiatica M 1989 Korea Frozen Cox1, ITS Sequencing
55 T. asiatica M - Seoul, Korea Frozen Cox1, ITS Sequencing
56 T. asiatica M 1991 Cheongju (Chungbuk), Korea Frozen Cox1, ITS Sequencing
57 T. asiatica - - Korea 10% Formalin Cox1, ITS Sequencing
58 T. asiatica F 1991 Cheongju (Chungbuk), Korea Frozen Cox1, ITS Sequencing
59 T. asiatica M 1992 Cheongju (Chungbuk), Korea 10% Formalin Cox1, ITS Sequencing
60 T. asiatica M/71 - Korea 10% Formalin Cox1, ITS Sequencing
61 T. asiatica M - Korea 10% Formalin Cox1, ITS Sequencing
62 T. saginata M/39 2004 Cheongju (Chungbuk), Korea Frozen Cox1, ITS Sequencing
63 T. asiatica - 2003 Jeju, Korea 70% Ethanol Cox1, ITS Sequencing
64 T. asiatica - 2003 Jeju, Korea 70% Ethanol Cox1, ITS Sequencing
65 T. saginata M/37 2003 Korea 70% Ethanol Cox1, ITS Sequencing
66 T. asiatica F/65 2004 Chuncheon, Korea 70% Ethanol Cox1, ITS Sequencing
67 T. saginata M 2005 Jeju, Korea 70% Ethanol Cox1, ITS Sequencing
68 T. asiatica M/66 1998 Luzhai, China Frozen Cox1, ITS Sequencing
69 T. asiatica M/64 1998 Luzhai, China Frozen Cox1, ITS Sequencing
70 T. asiatica M/55 1998 Luzhai, China Frozen Cox1, ITS Sequencing
71 T. asiatica M/28 1998 Luzhai, China Frozen Cox1, ITS Sequencing
72 T. asiatica M/30 1998 Luzhai, China Frozen Cox1, ITS Sequencing
73 T. asiatica M/18 1998 Luzhai, China Frozen Cox1, ITS Sequencing
74 T. asiatica M/59 1968 Izumo, Japan 10% Formalin Cox1 Sequencing
75 T. asiatica M/41 1996 Yonago, Japan 10% Formalin Cox1 Sequencing
76 T. asiatica M/40 1970 Samosir, Indonesia 10% Formalin Cox1 Sequencing
77 T. asiatica F/40 1982 Samosir, Indonesia 10% Formalin Cox1 Sequencing
78 T. asiatica - - Taiwan Frozen Cox1 Sequencing
79 T. asiatica - - Taiwan Frozen Cox1 Sequencing
80 T. saginata - - Taiwan Frozen Cox1 Sequencing
81 T. saginata - 1991 Thailand Frozen Cox1 Sequencing
82 T. asiatica - - Manila, Philippine Frozen Cox1 Sequencing. Multiplex PCR
83 T. saginata - - Manila, Philippine Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
84 T. saginata - - Beijing, China 70% Ethanol Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
85 T. saginata - 1999 Guangxi, China 70% Ethanol Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
86 T. saginata - 1999 Guangxi, China 70% Ethanol Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
87 T. saginata - 1999 Guangxi, China 70% Ethanol Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
88 T. saginata - - Henan, China 70% Ethanol Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
89 T. solium - 1998 Luzhai, China 70% Ethanol Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
90 T. solium - 1999 Guangxi, China 70% Ethanol Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
91 T. solium M/28 1998 Tiandong, China 70% Ethanol Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
92 T. solium M/31 1998 Tiandong, China 70% Ethanol Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
93 T. solium - - Sanjiang, China 70% Ethanol Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
94 T. solium - 2000 Nei Mongu, China 70% Ethanol Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
95 T. saginata F/51 2003 Mongolia 70% Ethanol Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
96 T. saginata F/40 2002 Savanakhet, Laos Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
97 T. saginata F/48 2002 Savanakhet, Laos Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
98 T. saginata F/53 2002 Savanakhet, Laos Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
99 T. saginata M/28 2003 Khammouane, Laos Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
100 T. saginata M/18 2003 Khammouane, Laos Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
101 T. saginata M/34 2003 Khammouane, Laos Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
102 T. saginata M/43 2003 Khammouane, Laos Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
103 T. saginata F/42 2003 Khammouane, Laos Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
104 T. saginata F/30 2003 Khammouane, Laos Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
105 T. saginata M/23 2003 Khammouane, Laos Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
106 T. saginata F/41 2003 Khammouane, Laos Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
107 T. saginata M/56 2003 Khammouane, Laos Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
108 T. saginata F/40 2003 Khammouane, Laos Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
109 T. saginata M/65 2003 Khammouane, Laos Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
110 T. saginata M/55 2003 Khammouane, Laos Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
111 T. saginata - 2007 Khokong, Cambodia Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
112 T. saginata M/10 2007 Khokong, Cambodia Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
113 T. saginata F/12 2007 Khokong, Cambodia Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
114 T. saginata M/19 2007 Khokong, Cambodia Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
115 T. saginata M/27 2007 Khokong, Cambodia Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
116 T. saginata F/17 2007 Khokong, Cambodia Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
117 T. saginata F/54 2007 Khokong, Cambodia Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
118 T. saginata M/19 2007 Khokong, Cambodia Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
119 T. saginata F/16 2007 Khokong, Cambodia Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
120 T. saginata M/40 2007 Khokong, Cambodia Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
121 T. saginata F/44 2007 Khokong, Cambodia Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
122 T. saginata M/50 2007 Khokong, Cambodia Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
123 T. saginata M/52 2007 Khokong, Cambodia Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
124 T. saginata F/36 2007 Khokong, Cambodia Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
125 T. saginata F/24 2007 Khokong, Cambodia Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
126 T. saginata F/35 2007 Khokong, Cambodia Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
127 T. saginata M/28 2007 Khokong, Cambodia Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
128 T. saginata F/59 2007 Khokong, Cambodia Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
129 T. saginata M/48 2007 Khokong, Cambodia Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
130 T. saginata F/28 2007 Khokong, Cambodia Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
131 T. saginata F/42 2007 Khokong, Cambodia Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
132 T. solium M/15 2006 Mbulu, Tanzania Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
133 T. saginata M/15 2007 Izaka, Tanzania Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
134 T. saginata M/40 2007 Izaka, Tanzania Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
135 T. saginata M/14 2007 Izaka, Tanzania Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
136 T. saginata M15 2007 Izaka, Tanzania Frozen Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
137 T. solium - 2001 Cape Verde 70% Ethanol Cox1 Sequencing, Multiplex PCR
138 T. saginata - - Ethiopia 70% Ethanol Cox1 Sequencing
139 T. saginata - 2003 Chile 70% Ethanol Cox1 Sequencing
140 T. solium - 2001 Honduras 70% Ethanol Cox1 Sequencing
141 T. saginata - 1999 France 70% Ethanol Cox1 Sequencing
142 T. saginata - 1997 Poland 70% Ethanol Cox1 Sequencing
143 T. saginata - 1929 Switzerland 10% Formalin Cox1 Sequencing
144 T. saginata - 1931 Switzerland 10% Formalin Cox1 Sequencing
145 T. saginata - 1941 Switzerland 10% Formalin Cox1 Sequencing
146 T. saginata - 1941 Switzerland 10% Formalin Cox1 Sequencing
147 T. saginata - 1941 Switzerland 10% Formalin Cox1 Sequencing
148 T. saginata - 1941 Switzerland 10% Formalin Cox1 Sequencing
149 T. saginata - 1941 Switzerland 10% Formalin Cox1 Sequencing
150 T. saginata - 1941 Switzerland 10% Formalin Cox1 Sequencing
151 T. saginata - 1990 Belgium 70% Ethanol Cox1 Sequencing

a Data partly by courtesy of Eom et al. (2002), Jeon et al. (2008), and Jeon et al. (2009).

-, unknown.

Editorial Office
Department of Molecular Parasitology, Samsung Medical Center, School of Medicine, Sungkyunkwan University,
2066 Seobu-ro, Jangan-gu, Suwon 16419, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
Tel: +82-31-299-6251   FAX: +82-1-299-6269   E-mail: kjp.editor@gmail.com
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © 2024 by The Korean Society for Parasitology and Tropical Medicine.     Developed in M2PI